The Single Judge held the Crl.O.P. not maintainable in view of an earlier Division Bench order in a batch of cases and disposed of the petition, directing the petitioner to workout his remedy as per that order.
None; liberty given to petitioner to workout remedy as per the Division Bench order in Crl.O.P (MD) No. 13681 of 2018.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 11.12.2019 CORAM:
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P. RAJAMANICKAM
Crl.O.P. No. 31000 of 2019
R. Praveenraj ...Petitioner
The Sub-Inspector of Police, Law and order
N-1, Police Station, Royapuram, Chennai-13. ...Respondent
Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Code of Criminal Procedure, to direct the respondent to take further action based on the complaint dated 01.08.2019 in C.S.R. No. 636 of 2019 and investigate the same in accordance with law.
For Petitioner :Mr.E.Paulraj
This Petition has been filed to direct the respondent to take further action based on the complaint dated 01.08.2019 in C.S.R. No. 636 of 2019 and investigate the same in accordance with law.
Assistant Registrar(J)
Sub-Assistant Registrar
To
Crl.O.P. No. 31000 of 2019
SP(19/12/2019)
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the Criminal Original Petition is maintainable under Section 482 CrPC to direct police investigation based on a specific complaint.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
A batch of casesFollowed¶12
Crl.O.P (MD) No. 13681 of 2018
1 provisions across 1 enactments
R. Praveenraj
The Sub-Inspector of Police, Law and order, N-1, Police Station, Royapuram, Chennai-13
P. Rajamanickam
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
