Allowed

Sundaravadivel, v. the Inspector of Police

Madras HC13 Jun 2019CRL MP(MD)/4897/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The petitioner sought relaxation of conditions imposed in a connected bail application. Finding that the petitioner was complying with the conditions regularly and no tampering with witnesses was reported, the court relaxed the conditions.

What did the court decide?

The condition imposed by the court in Crl.O.P(MD)No.4782 of 2019 dated 29.03.2019 was relaxed, subject to the petitioner reporting for interrogation.

Sundaravadivel, Vs the Inspector of Police — Anticipatory Bail | Madras HC (2019)

¶1

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction )

¶3

Thursday, the Thirteenth day of June Two Thousand Nineteen

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

The Hon`ble Mr.Justice P.RAJAMANICKAM

¶6

CRL MP(MD) No.4897 of 2019 IN CRL OP(MD) No.4782 of 2019

¶7

SUNDARAVADIVEL ... PETITIONER/ PETITIONER Vs

¶8

STATE REP.BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE PATTESHWARAM POLICE STATION, KUMBAKONAM, THANJAVUR DISTRICT. CRIME NO.50 OF 2019 ... RESPONDENT/ RESPONDENT

¶9

Petition praying that in the circumstances stated therein and in the petition filed therewith the High Court will be pleased to relax the condition imposed in Crl OP(MD)No.4782 of 2019 dated 29.03.2019.

¶10

Order : This petition coming on for orders upon perusing the petition filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of M/S.S.PAULMURUGESH, Advocate for the petitioner and of M/s.M.ANANTHA DEVI, Government Advocate(Crl.Side) on behalf of the Respondents the court made the following order:-

¶11

This petition has been filed to relax the condition imposed on the petitioner in Crl.O.P(MD)No.4782 of 2019.

¶12

The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner has been complying with the condition imposed by this court in Crl.O.P(MD)No.4782 of 2019 on 29.03.2019 regularly, and he prays for relaxation of the said condition.

¶13

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶14

¶15

The learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) submitted that the petitioner has been complying with the condition regularly.

¶16

Taking into consideration the fact that the petitioner is complying with the condition regularly and there is no complaint of the petitioner tampering with the witnesses, the condition imposed by this court in Crl.O.P(MD)No.4782 of 2019 on 29.03.2019 is relaxed. However, the petitioner shall report before the respondent as and when required for interrogation.

¶17

Madurai Bench of Madras High Court,

¶18

/ TRUE COPY /
Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.)
Madurai Bench of Madras High Court,
Madurai - 625 023.
TO
1. THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, KUMBAKONAM,
THANAJVUR DISTRICT.
2. DO-THROUGH THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE,
THANJAVUR DISTRICT AT KUMBAKONAM.
3. THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE
PATTESHWARAM POLICE STATION,
KUMBAKONAM, THANJAVUR DISTRICT.
4. THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,
MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.
+1. C.C. to M/S.S.PAULMURUGESH Advocate SR.No.9826
ORDER
IN
CRL MP(MD) No.4897 of 2019
IN
CRL OP(MD) No.4782 of 2019
Date :13/06/2019

¶19

MS/VR/SAR-4/18.06.2019/2P.6C

¶20

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Sundaravadivel, v. the Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sundaravadivel, v. the Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Daisy Nabi Kumar, Vs the Inspector of Police

Vijay, Vs the Inspector of Police

Selvindevadhass, Vs the Inspector of Police

Thamaraikannan @ Thamarai Vs the Inspector of Police

Rajamani, S/O.Jangal, Vs the Forest Regional Officer

Prinsh @ Prince Stalin, Vs the Inspector of Police