Allowed

Rajamani, S/O.Jangal, v. the Forest Regional Officer

Madras HC13 Jun 2019CRL MP(MD)/4896/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner sought relaxation of a bail condition imposed in related Cr.O.P No.5697 of 2019. The court granted the relaxation since the petitioner was complying regularly and no tampering complaints existed, subject to reporting for interrogation.

What did the court decide?

The condition imposed in Crl.O.P(MD)No.5697 of 2019 dated 16.04.2019 on the petitioner is relaxed. The petitioner shall report before the respondent as and when required for interrogation.

Rajamani, S/O.Jangal, Vs the Forest Regional Officer — Writ and Judicial Review | Madras HC (2019)

¶1

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction )

¶3

Thursday, the Thirteenth day of June Two Thousand Nineteen

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

The Hon`ble Mr.Justice P.RAJAMANICKAM

¶6

RAJAMANI ... PETITIONER/ PETITIONER

¶7

¶8

STATE REP. BY

¶9

THE FOREST REGIONAL OFFICER, GANDAMANUR, THENI DISTRICT.

¶10

W.L.O.R.NO.2 OF 2019 ... RESPONDENT/ RESPONDENT

¶11

Petition praying that in the circumstances stated therein and in the petition filed therewith the High Court will be pleased to relax the condition imposed on the petitioners vide order dated 16.04.2019 made in Crl OP(MD)No.5697 of 2019 on the file of this Hon’ble Court.

¶12

Order : This petition coming on for orders upon perusing the petition filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of MR.A.KARTHICK KUMAR, Advocate for the petitioner and of Mrs.M.ANANTHA DEVI, Government Advocate (Crl.Side) on behalf of the Respondent, the court made the following order:-

¶13

This petition has been filed to relax the condition imposed on the petitioner in Crl.O.P(MD)No.5697 of 2019.

¶14

The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner has been complying with the condition imposed by this court in Crl.O.P(MD)No.5697 of 2019 on 16.04.2019 regularly, and he prays for relaxation of the said condition.

¶15

The learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) submitted that the petitioner has been complying with the condition regularly.

¶16

Taking into consideration the fact that the petitioner is https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ complying with the condition regularly and there is no complaint of the petitioner tampering with the witnesses, the condition imposed

¶17

¶18

by this court in Crl.O.P(MD)No.5697 of 2019 on 16.04.2019 is relaxed. However, the petitioner shall report before the respondent as and when required for interrogation.

¶19

Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court,

¶20

Madurai - 625 023.

¶21

TO 1. THE FOREST REGIONAL OFFICER, GANDAMANUR, THENI DISTRICT. 2. THE FOREST RANGER, GANDAMANUR, THENI DISTRICT. 3. THE OFFICER INCHARGE,SUB JAIL, THENI. 4. THE SUPERINTENDENT,CENTRAL PRISON, MADURAI. 5. THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI. +1. CC to Mr.M.S.JEYAKARTHIK, Advocate SR.No.9657 ORDER IN CRL MP(MD) No.4896 of 2019 IN CRL OP(MD) No.5697 of 2019 Date :13/06/2019

¶22

JM/VR/SAR 2/21.06.2019/2P/7C

¶23

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Rajamani, S/O.Jangal, v. the Forest Regional Officer

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rajamani, S/O.Jangal, v. the Forest Regional Officer

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Daisy Nabi Kumar, Vs the Inspector of Police

Vijay, Vs the Inspector of Police

Selvindevadhass, Vs the Inspector of Police

Thamaraikannan @ Thamarai Vs the Inspector of Police

Sundaravadivel, Vs the Inspector of Police

Prinsh @ Prince Stalin, Vs the Inspector of Police