Allowed

Daisy Nabi Kumar, v. the Inspector of Police

Madras HC12 Jun 2019CRL MP(MD)/4777/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This order grants a petition by an accused person to relax a bail condition previously imposed by the Madras High Court. The respondent has been complying with the condition, and with the Government's consent, the court relaxed the requirement now mandating reporting for interrogation. This was disposed summarily based on compliance.

What did the court decide?

The condition imposed in Crl.O.P(MD)No.6857 of 2019 dated 08.05.2019 on the petitioner is relaxed, requiring him to report when summoned for interrogation.

Daisy Nabi Kumar, Vs the Inspector of… — Constitutional and Fundamental Rights | Madras HC (2019)

¶1

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction )

¶3

Wednesday, the Twelfth day of June Two Thousand Nineteen

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

The Hon`ble Mr.Justice P.RAJAMANICKAM

¶6

CRL MP(MD) No.4777 of 2019 IN CRL OP(MD) No.6857 of 2019

¶7

DAISY NABI KUMAR ... PETITIONER/ACCUSED No.1 Vs

¶8

THE STATE OF TAMILNADU, THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE DISTRICT CRIME BRANCH, NAGERCOIL, KANYAKUMARI DISTRICT.

¶9

CRIME NO.30/2018 ... RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT

¶10

Petition praying that in the circumstances stated therein and in the petition filed therewith the High Court will be pleased to relax the condition imposed in Crl.O.P(MD).No.6857/2019 dated 08/05/2019 on the file of this Honourable High Court.

¶11

Order :This petition coming on for orders upon perusing the petition filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of M/S.ANANTH C.RAJESH, Advocate for the petitioner and of MRS.M.ANANTHADEVI, Government Advocate on behalf of the Respondents the court made the following order:-

¶12

This petition has been filed to relax, the condition

¶13

imposed on the petitioner in Crl.O.P(MD)No.6857 of 2019 on 08.05.2019.

¶14

2.The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner has been complying with the condition imposed by this https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ Court in Crl.O.P(MD)No.6857 of 2019 on 08.05.2019 regularly, and he prays for relaxation of the said condition.

¶15

¶16

3.The learned Government (Crl.Side) submitted that the petitioner has been complying with the condition regularly.

¶17

4.Taking into consideration the fact that the petitioner is complying with the condition regularly and there is no complaint of the petitioner tampering with the witnesses, the condition imposed by this Court in Crl.O.P(MD)No.6857 of 2019 on 08.05.2019 is relaxed. However, the petitioner shall report before the respondent as and when required for interrogation.

¶18

sd/-
12/06/2019
/ TRUE COPY /
Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.)
Madurai Bench of Madras High Court,
Madurai - 625 023.
TO
1.THE JUDICIALMAGISTRATE NO.II,
KUZHITHURAI, KANYAKUMARI DISTRICT.
2.THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE
KANYAKUMARI DISTRICT AT NAGERCOIL.
3.THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE
DISTRICT CRIME BRANCH, NAGERCOIL,
KANYAKUMARI DISTRICT
4.THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,
MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT,
MADURAI.
+1. C.C. to M/S.ANANTH C.RAJESH Advocate SR.No.9540
ORDER
IN
CRL MP(MD) No.4777 of 2019
IN
CRL OP(MD) No.6857 of 2019
Date :12/06/2019
DSS
https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ PK/JC/SAR-4/17.06.2019 : 2P/6C

Daisy Nabi Kumar, v. the Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Daisy Nabi Kumar, v. the Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ramesh, Vs the Inspector of Police

Saravanan, Vs the Inspector of Police

Gnanatheeebam Vs the Inspector of Police

Vijay, Vs the Inspector of Police

Selvindevadhass, Vs the Inspector of Police

Gopi Vs the Inspector of Police