Allowed

Abdul Majith v. the Inspector of Police

Madras HC14 Jun 2019CRL MP(MD)/4757/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Madurai Bench of Madras High Court granted a petition seeking relaxation of conditions imposed in a prior order of Quo Warranto relief. Finding no evidence of witness tampering and regular compliance, the court relaxed the terms while maintaining a reporting obligation.

What did the court decide?

The condition imposed in Crl.O.P(MD)No.4547 of 2019 on 24.04.2019 is relaxed; petitioners shall report as and when required for interrogation.

Abdul Majith Vs the Inspector of Police — Writ and Judicial Review | Madras HC (2019)

¶1

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction )

¶3

Friday, the Fourteenth day of June Two Thousand Nineteen

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

The Hon`ble Mr.Justice P.RAJAMANICKAM

¶6

CRL MP(MD) No.4757 of 2019 IN CRL OP(MD) No.4547 of 2019

¶7

1 ABDUL MAJITH

¶8

2 DANI RANJITHKUMAR ... PETITIONERS/PETITIONERS

¶9

¶10

THE STATE REP.BY,

¶11

THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, AYYAMPETTAI POLICE STATION, THANJAVUR DISTRICT.

¶12

(CRIME NO.29/2019) ... RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT

¶13

Petition praying that in the circumstances stated therein and in the petition filed therewith the High Court will be pleased to relax the condition imposed in Crl.O.P(MD).No.4547/2019 dated 24/04/2019 on the file of this Honourable High Court.

¶14

Order : This petition coming on for orders upon perusing the petition filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of M/S.K.M.KARUNAKARAN, Advocate for the petitioner and of MRS.M.ANANTHADEVI, Government Advocate on behalf of the Respondent, the court made the following order:-

¶15

This petition has been filed to relax the condition imposed on the petitioners in Crl.O.P(MD)No.4547 of 2019.

¶16

The learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners have been complying with the condition imposed by this court in Crl.O.P(MD)No.4547of 2019 regularly, and he prays for https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ relaxation of the said condition.

¶17

¶18

The learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) submitted that the petitioners have been complying with the condition regularly.

¶19

Taking into consideration the fact that the petitioners are complying with the condition regularly and there is no complaint of the petitioners tampering with the witnesses, the condition imposed by this court in Crl.O.P(MD)No.4547 of 2019 on 24.04.2019 is relaxed. However, the petitioners shall report before the respondent as and when required for interrogation.

¶20

sd/14/06/2019 / TRUE COPY /

¶21

Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023. TO

¶22

1.THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO III THANJAVUR.

¶23

2.DO THROUGH THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, THANJAVUR DISTRICT AT KUMBAKONAM.

¶24

3.THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE AYYAMPETTAI POLICE STATION, THANJAVUR DISTRICT.

¶25

4.THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

¶26

ORDER IN CRL MP(MD) No.4757 of 2019 IN

¶27

CRL OP(MD) No.4547 of 2019 Date :14/06/2019 AAV PK/JC/SAR-2/19.06.2019 : 2P/5C

¶28

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Abdul Majith v. the Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Abdul Majith v. the Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Thamaraikannan @ Thamarai Vs the Inspector of Police

Rajamani, S/O.Jangal, Vs the Forest Regional Officer

Sundaravadivel, Vs the Inspector of Police

Selvamani, Vs the Inspector of Police

P.Muthurasu, Vs the Inspector of Police

K.S. Packiyaraj Vs the Intelligence Officer