S.Rajasekaran v. K.Pandi
Case brief
What is this about?
On an application to close contempt petitions filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act 1971, the Court accepted the submission that the entire amount had been paid and closed the contempt proceedings.
What did the court decide?
The contempt petitions are closed.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Dated 04.04.2019
Coram
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE T. RAJA
**Contempt Petition Nos.1659 and 1660 of 2017 ***********
S.Rajasekaran ... Petitioner in Cont.P. No.1659 of 2017 C.Sekaran ... Petitioner in Cont.P. No.1660 of 2017 Versus K.Pandi, The Managing Director, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (Salem) Limited, No.12, Ramakrishna Road, Salem-636 007. ... Respondent in both cases
Prayer in both cases: Petitions filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act 1971 to punish the respondent herein for having wilfully disobeyed the order dated 22.06.2016 made in W.P. Nos.21369 & 21373 of 2016.
For Petitioner in both cases : Mr.T.Ananthasekar For Respondent in both cases: Ms.S.Rajeni Ramadoss, Standing Counsel O R D E R
When the matters are taken up for hearing, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners would submit that the entire amount has been paid at the rate of 6% per annum.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioners' submission that the entire amount was paid at the rate of 6% per annum warranted closing the contempt petitions.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
S.Rajasekaran
- petitioner
C.Sekaran
- respondent
K.Pandi
- respondent
The Managing Director, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (Salem) Limited
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court