Petitioner challenged a Labour Court award seeking reinstatement. No party appeared. The petition was dismissed for lack of prosecution by the Assistant Registrar.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 03.04.2019
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE T.RAJA W.P.No.11627 of 2009
P.R.Krishnamurthi .. Petitioner
-vs-
1. The Management
Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation
Villupuram
Villupuram District
2. The Labour Court
Cuddalore District
Cuddalore .. Respondents
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of
India, praying for the issue of a Writ of Certiorari,
calling for the concerned records relating to the award
dated 24.01.2008 made in I.D.No.112 of 1997 passed by the
second respondent and quash the same and directing the
first respondent to reinstate the petitioner in service
with all attendant benefits.
For Petitioner:: No appearance
For Respondents:: No appearance for R1
R2-Court
ORDER
When the matter was taken up, none appeared for the
petitioner as well as the first respondent. Therefore, the
writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar(CS)
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
ss
To
1. The Management
Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation
Villupuram,Villupuram District
2. The Labour Court
Cuddalore, Cuddalore District
W.P.No.11627 of 2009
A.SK(08/05/2019)
P.R. Krishnamurthi
Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation
Labour Court
T. Raja
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
