The petitioner filed a contempt petition under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 for disobedience of a previous order. The court noted a joint statement that the order was duly complied with and closed the petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 04.03.2019
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE T.RAJA
Contempt Petition No.1291 of 2018
S.Hema .. Petitioner
-vs-
1. Thiru.Thiyagarajan
The District Education Officer
Nagapattinam
Nagapattinam District
2. Thiru.Boovaraghavan
The Additional Assistant Elementary
Educational Officer
Sirkali Range
Nagapattinam District .. Respondents
Petition under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts
Act, 1971 praying to punish the respondents for wilful
disobedience of the order of this Court dated 29.03.2016
made in W.P.No.11577 of 2016.
For Petitioner :: Mr.G.Sankaran
For Respondents :: Mr.K.Karthikeyan
Government Advocate
ORDER
A joint statement has been made by both the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ Advocate for the respondents that the order passed by this
2
Court has been duly complied with. Recording their joint
statement, this contempt petition stands closed.
SD/-
ASSISTANT REGISTRAR(COMM.CASES)
tsi
//Certified to be true copy//
Dated at Madras this the day of 2019.
COURT OFFICER(O.S.)
from 25 th day of September 2008 the Registry is issuing
Certified copies of the Orders/Judgments/Decrees in this
format.
SS/21/03/2019
1 provisions across 1 enactments
S. Hema
Thiru. Thiyagarajan
Thiru. Boovaraghavan
T. Raja
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
