The court dismissed a writ petition challenging an impugned order because the petitioner's reinstatement prayer had already been granted by a subsequent order revoking the suspension, rendering the petition infructuous.
Dismissal of the writ petition as infructuous; closure of the connected miscellaneous petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED 01.03.2019
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE T.RAJA
Writ Petition No.26850 of 2008 and M.P. No.1 of 2008
V.Gowri .. Petitioner
Versus The District Collector, Krishnagiri District, Krishnagiri. .. Respondent
Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a writ of Certiorarified mandamus calling for the records of the respondent relating to the order in Pro.Na.Ka.No.156/2006/A1 dated 12.12.2007 quash the same and issue consequential direction to the respondent to reinstate the petitioner in service with all consequential benefits.
For Petitioner : Mr.D.S.Thirumavalavan
For Respondent : Mr.K.Ravikumar Additional Government Pleader
O R D E R
When the matter is taken up for hearing, by placing an order reinstating the petitioner in service, learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the respondent would submit that the prayer in the writ petition has become infructuous since the petitioner's request for reinstatement was ordered by revoking the suspension order.
2.In view of the submission made by the learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the respondent, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. Consequently, connected M.P. is closed. No costs.
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar (CCC)
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
vga
To
The District Collector,
Krishnagiri District,
Krishnagiri.
+1 cc to the Government Pleader, S.R.No.19976
Writ Petition No.26850 of 2008
and M.P. No.1 of 2008
GJ-II(CO)
SSM(04/04/2019)
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition for reinstatement remains maintainable given prior revocation of the suspension order?
1 provisions across 1 enactments
V. Gowri
The District Collector, Krishnagiri District, Krishnagiri
T. Raja
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
