Disposed

The Managing Director v. Sekar

Madras HC14 Sept 2019CMA/1049/2013

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court Legal Services Committee, via Lok Adalat, set aside the pending appeal as the appellant Transport Corporation agreed to settle with the respondent. The Tribunal award of Rs.1 lakh with interest was confirmed, and the corporation was directed to deposit the amount.

What did the court decide?

Appeal dismissed; Tribunal award of Rs. 1,00,000 with interest confirmed; Appellant directed to deposit the amount.

The Managing Director Vs Sekar — Contract and Commercial Disputes | Madras HC (2019)

¶1

¶2

HIGH COURT LEGAL SERVICES COMMITTEE, CHENNAI National Lok Adalat organised by the High Court Legal Services Committee Saturday, the 14^th day of September, 2019

¶3

LOK ADALAT AWARD

¶4

(Chapter VI and u/s 21 of Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987) Presided over by

¶5

The Hon'ble Mr.JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI and

¶6

Members:

¶7

Mr.M.Sambasivam Mr.T.R.Ravi

¶8

C.M.A.No.1049 of 2013

¶9

(Appeal against the judgment and decree dated 09.07.2012 and made in M.C.O.P.No.444 of 2007, on the file of Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Additional Subordinate Judge, Chengalpattu.)

¶10

The Managing Director Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation, (Division-III) Kanchipuram. ... Appellant /versus/ Sekar ... Respondent

¶11

This case is not listed today. However, it is taken up before this Lok Adalat at the instance of the learned counsel for the Transport Corporation. The appellant is present. Mr.K.J.Sivakumar, learned counsel for appellant is present.

¶12

AWARD

¶13

This appeal is preferred by the appellant Transport Corporation as against the award dated 09.07.2012 passed by the Motor Accidents Claims

¶14

http://www.judis.nic.in

¶15

¶16

Tribunal, Additional Subordinate Judge, Chengalpattu in M.C.O.P.No.444 of 2007.

¶17

The learned counsel for the appellant submitted that the appellant Transport Corporation agreed to satisfy the award passed by the Tribunal. In view of the same, the award of the Tribunal at Rs.1,00,000/-(Rupees One Lakh only) with interest at the rate of 7.5% per annum from the date of numbering of the petition 30.11.2007 till the date of deposit (excluding the period of dismissal for default if any), is hereby confirmed.

¶18

3.Hence, the appellant Transport Corporation is directed to deposit the entire award amount with interest and costs, after deducting the amount already deposited, if any, within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this award. On such deposit being made, the Tribunal is directed to transfer the same to the respondent/claimant, on proper identification through RTGS in accordance with the terms of the award, without insisting on any formal permission petition.

¶19

4.Accordingly, the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is disposed of. Consequently, connected civil miscellaneous petition/s, if any, is/are closed.

¶20

The Managing Director Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation, (Division-III) Kanchipuram.

¶21

Counsel for the Appellant

¶22

http://www.judis.nic.in

¶23

¶24

This Lok Adalat award is passed in terms of the above settlement. The full Court fee paid shall be refunded to the appellant in the manner provided under Section 69-A of the Tamil Nadu Court-Fees and Suits Valuation Act, 1955 and the Court Fees Act, 1870 as provided for under sub Sec.1 of Section 21 r/w 25 of LSA Act 1987 as amended in 1994.

¶25

Judge
Member Member
To:The parties/Advocate concerned
Copy to:
1.The Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal,
Additional Subordinate Judge, Chengalpattu.
2.The Secretary, High Court Legal Services Committee, Chennai.
3.The Section Officer, V.R.Section, High Court, Madras.
4.The Section Officer, Lok Adalat Section, High Court, Madras.+2 copies

¶26

http://www.judis.nic.in

¶27

¶28

M.DHANDAPANI,J. pri

¶29

C.M.A.No.1049 of 2013

¶30

14.09.2019

¶31

http://www.judis.nic.in

The Managing Director v. Sekar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

The Managing Director v. Sekar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

D.Laxman Vs Harmandar Singh IAS

V.Vijith, S/o.Vijayan Vs The Secretary to Government

A.S.Murugesan Vs The Government of Tamil Nadu

The Managing Director Vs R.Muthusamy

Tamil Nadu State Vs G. Subramani

The Managing Director, Tnstc., Dharmapuri Vs Chinnapaiyan