Vedachala Naicker v. Veerammal
Case brief
What is this about?
High Court Judge dismissed a First Appeal filed under Section 96 CPC as abated because the appellant had been reported dead and no steps were taken by counsel to proceed.
What did the court decide?
First Appeal dismissed as abated. No costs. Connected miscellaneous petition closed.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 27.06.2019
CORAM:
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE T.RAVINDRAN A.S.No.1078 of 2003
Vedhachala Naicker
...Appellant
Vs.
1.Veerammal
2.Rajeswari
3.Govindammal
4.Alamelu ammal
5.Manickammal
6.Varadambal
7.Kamalammal
8.Jayammal
...Respondents
Prayer: First Appeal filed under Section 96 of C.P.C., against the decree and judgment dated 20.09.1994 made in O.S.No.147 of 1990 on the file of the Principal Subordinate Judge at Chengalpattu.
For Appellant : Mr.M.S.Subramanian
For Respondents : No appearance
The appellant had already been reported dead and despite the opportunity to enable the counsel for the appellant to take steps for the deceased appellant, no steps have been taken with reference to the same as per law to proceed further in the matter. In such view of the matter, there is no purpose in keeping this First Appeal further pending.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Vedhachala Naicker
- respondent
Veerammal
- respondent
Rajeswari
- respondent
Govindammal
- respondent
Alamelu ammal
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court