and the abovesaid partition deed has been marked as Ex.A1 by the plaintiff. Considering the abovesaid partition deed, particularly, the recitals contained therein, it is found that as rightly putforth by the plaintiff, the suit property, being the ancestral property of the plaintiff's family, in the partition effected by way of the Ex.A1 partition deed, the same had come to be allotted to the share of the plaintiff. Following the allotment of the suit property towards the plaintiff's share, it is seen that pattas had been issued in favour of the plaintiff and the same have been marked as Exs.A2 and A3. To establish that the plaintiff has been in the possession and enjoyment of the suit property from the days of his predecessor in interest, the electricity bills have been marked as Ex.A4 and A6. The tax receipt has been marked as Ex.A5 and in addition to that, the plaintiff has also tendered evidence with reference to his claim of title to the suit property in a clear and acceptable manner. Therefore, as rightly determined by the Courts below, the plaintiff is found to have established his claim of title to the suit property.
