The Madras High Court dismissed an application by defendants seeking permission to file an additional written statement. The application was removed on the plaintiff counsel's agreement to withdraw an objection regarding the partnership firm's registration certificate.
Application dismissed as withdrawn; specific evidence portion expunged.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
THURSDAY, THE 11th DAY OF JULY 2019
THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE PUSHPA SATHYANARAYANA
A. No.4752 of 2019 in C.S. No.586 of 2012
M/s.Sathyanarayana Bros,
Partnership Firm, rep. by its Managing Partner, Mr.K.R.Purushotham, Old Nos.83 & 84, Dr.Radhakrishnan Salai, Mylapore, Chennai600 004. ... Plaintiff -Versus1. T.Kokila, 2. T.Elumalai, 3. Tmt.Sarala, 4. T.Narayanan, 5. T.Kumar, 6. T.Manikandan, 7. Selvi T.Usha, 8. Selvi T.Shanthi, All are residing at Old No.84,Dr.Radhakrishnan Salai, Mylapore, Chennai-600 004. ... Defendants A. No.4752 of 2019: 1.T.Elumalai, S/o.Late A.N.Thangappan
2.Tmt. Sarala, D/o.Late A.N.Thangappan
3.T.Narayanan, S/o.Late A.N.Thangappan
4.T.Kumar, S/o.Late A.N.Thangappan
2
5.T.Manikandan, S/o.Late A.N.Thangappan
6.Selvi.T.Usha, D/o.Late A.N.Thangappan
7.Selvi.T.Shanthi, D/o.Late.A.N.Thangappan
all are residing at No.84, Dr.Radhakrishnan Salai, Mylapore, Chennai 600 004
..Applicants/Defendants
-vs-
M/s.Sathyanarayana Bros,
Partnership Firm, rep. by its Managing Partner, Mr.K.R.Purushotham, Old Nos.83 & 84, Dr.Radhakrishnan Salai, Mylapore,
Chennai 600 004. ...Respondent/Plaintiff
Application praying that this Honble Court be pleased to permit the applicants/defendants to file the additional written statement in the above suit in C.S.No.586/2012.
This application coming on this day before this court for hearing the court made the following order:-
This application is filed by the applicants / defendants seeking permission to file the additional written statement in the above suit in C.S.No.586 of 2012.
examination, there was a question raised relating to production of the certificate of the registration of partnership firm. It was recorded during cross examination that "since nothing has been https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
raised in the written statement as to the plaintiff firm a registered firm or not and the Hon'ble Court has not framed any
3
issue in this aspect, the question has been objected by the learned counsel for the plaintiff and the objection is upheld". In view of the above answer given, the learned counsel for the applicants/defendants has filed this application seeking permission of this Court to file an additional written statement touching upon the above said point.
the learned counsel for the plaintiff states that he would withdraw the objection raised and that the defendants would continue with the cross examination without further waste of time. The learned counsel for the applicants/defendants also agreed that
as the plaintiff is withdrawing his objection, he would also withdraw this application.
counsel on both sides and as the learned counsel for the applicants/defendants has made an endorsement to withdraw this
application, this application is dismissed as withdrawn and the
portion mentioned above in quotes is expunged from the evidence recorded. The learned counsel for the defendants states that he
would complete the cross examination of P.W.1 in two days. Let
entire trial shall be completed on or before 30.09.2019.
Sd/.P.S.N.J
//Certified to be a true copy// Dated this the day of 2019.
https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ R.s/16.07.2019 COURT OFFICER
From 25.09.2008 the Registry is issuing certified copies of the Order/Judgment Decree in this format.
M/s. Sathyanarayana Bros
T.Elumalai
Tmt.Sarala
T.Narayanan
T.Kumar
T.Manikandan
Pushpa Sathyanarayana
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
