The applicant sought attachment against the first respondent for failing to furnish security of Rs. 5,21,589/- directed vide order dated 07.06.2019. The respondent was not present. The Court held service sufficient and passed the attachment order.
Attachment order shall be transmitted through District & Sessions Court, Bhusawal, Maharashtra.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
Application No.3311 of 2018
PUSHPA SATHYANARAYANA, J.
This Court, upon hearing the learned counsel for the applicant,
vide order dated 07.06.2019, directed the first respondent to furnish security to the extent of the claim made in the application being an amount of Rs.5,21,589/-, on or before 05.07.2019, failing which, an order of attachment order would be passed.
security ordered by this Court has been delivered and affidavit of
service is also filed to that effect. Though the name of the first respondent is printed in the cause list, there is no representation for
2
PUSHPA SATHYANARAYANA, J.
vv
him either in person or through counsel. Hence, service to the respondents is held sufficient. In the above circumstances, there shall be an order of attachment as prayed for. The order of attachment shall be transmitted through the District & Sessions Court, Bhusawal, Maharashtra and the attachment order may be hand delivered to the applicant for transmission.
1 issue framed by the court
Whether an order of attachment should be passed against the first respondent for failure to furnish security as directed by this Court.
PUSHPA SATHYANARAYANA
FIRST RESPONDENT
PUSHPA SATHYANARAYANA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
