Allowed

N.Muthukumar, v. the District Collector

Madras HC30 Nov 2018WP(MD)/22737/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a writ petition under Article 226, this single judge bench of the Madras High Court directed the District Collector and Assistant Director of Agriculture to recover Rs. 82,500 (portion of a total Rs. 1,65,000 subsidy) from three family members of a respondent who were erroneously granted subsidies under the National Agricultural Development Scheme due to violations of grant conditions.

What did the court decide?

The First Respondent is directed to recover Rs. 82,500 from the specified persons, give them notice, and file a compliance report by 28.02.2019.

N.Muthukumar, Vs the District Collector — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Madras HC (2018)

¶1

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED : 30.11.2018

¶4

CORAM:

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.K. SASIDHARAN and THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.D. AUDIKESAVALU

¶6

W.P. (MD) No. 22737 of 2018

¶7

N. Muthukumar ... Petitioner

¶8

-vs-

¶9

The District Collector, Sivagangai District, Sivagangai.

¶10

The Assistant Director of Agriculture, Block Agricultural Extension Centre, Ilayankudi, Sivagangai District.

¶11

Kanniyappan ... Respondents

¶12

PRAYER : Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the First and Second Respondents herein to recover the total subsidy amount of Rs.1,65,000/- from the Third Respondent herein, which has been provided for buying the total number of 6 Milch-cows under National Agricultural Development Scheme for the year 2015-2016 by considering the Petitioner's representation dated 25.10.2018.

¶13

For Petitioner : Mr. S. Mandhiralingeswaran For Respondents 1 & 2 : Mr. A.K. Baskarapandian Special Government Pleader

¶14

O R D E R (Order of the Court was made by P.D.AUDIKESAVALU, J.)

¶15

The Petitioner, who is an agriculturist, has filed this Public Interest Litigation for directing the District Collector, Sivagangai District, Sivagangai and the Assistant Director of Agriculture, Ilayankudi to recover the subsidy amount of Rs.1,65,000/- from the Third Respondent herein, which has been provided for buying milchcows under National Agricultural Development Scheme for the year 2015-2016. The complaint of the Petitioner is that the Third https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ Respondent by creating bogus documents made the Second Respondent to provide six milch-cows to his family members alone.

¶16

¶17

The Learned Special Government Pleader, took notice for the First and Second Respondents during the earlier hearing on 14.11.2018 and notice was ordered to the Third Respondent.

¶18

When the matter is taken up for hearing today, the Learned Special Government Pleader on instructions states that on enquiries made, the following amounts have been found to be sanctioned to the family members of the Third Respondent for purchase of milch-cows:-

¶19

S. No.	^{Name of the Beneficia}	^ries		Subsidy Sanctioned
1.	Mr. Kanniyappan, Lakshmipuram	S/o.	Udaiyar,	Rs.27,500/-
2.	Mrs. Rajamanickam, Lakshmipuram.	W/o.	Kanniyappan,	Rs.27,500/-
3.	Mr. Narayamoorthy, Lakhshmipuram.	S/o.	Kanniyappan,	Rs.27,500/-
4.	Mr. Rajasekar, Lakshmipuram.	S/o.	Kanniyappan,	Rs.27,500/-
5.	Mrs. Meghaladevi, Lakshmipuram.	W/o.	Rajasekar,	Rs.27,500/-
6.	Mrs. Ponmalar, Lakshmipuram	W/o.	Rajagopal,	Rs.27,500/-
	Total			Rs.1,65,000 /-

¶20

It is further stated that it has been ascertained that though the aforesaid six persons belong to the same family, separate ration cards in respect of three sets of families amongst them had been issued as they were not living as a joint family and the details of the same are furnished below:-

¶21

S. No.	^{Family Members}	Proof Document
	Mr. Kanniyappan, S/o. Udaiyar Mrs. Rajamanickam, W/o.	Family Card 25/G0284938	No.
1.	Kanniyappan	(Other family me	mbers
	Mr. Narayanamoorthy, S/o. Kanniyappan	have been issued separate Family Car	with ds)
2.	Mr. Rajasekar, S/o. Kanniyappan Mrs. Meghaladevi, W/o. Rajasekar	Family Card 25/G/0284906	No.
		Acknowledgment Re	ceipt
		bearing No. IK/16/	05017
3. https://hcservice	Mrs. Ponmalar, W/o. Rajagopal s.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/	dated 25.07.2016 having applied separate Family Car	for for d.

¶22

¶23

However, having regard to the fact that in violation of the conditions for grant of subsidy, three of the family members of the Third Respondent, viz., Mrs. Rajamanickam, W/o. Kanniyappan, Thiru. Narayanamoorthy, S/o. Kanniyappan and Mrs. Meghaladevi, W/o. Rajasekar, had been erroneously granted the amounts, a sum of Rs.27,500/- each towards subsidy has to be recovered from them.

¶24

In view of the aforesaid submissions made, the First Respondent is directed to take necessary action against the concerned persons belonging to the family of the Third Respondent to whom subsidy of Rs.27,500/- each, totalling Rs.82,500/- had been erroneously advanced after giving due notice to them and file a report of such compliance before the Registrar (Judicial) of this Court by 28.02.2019.

¶25

The Writ Petition is disposed of on the aforesaid terms. No costs.

¶26

Sd/-

¶27

Assistant Registrar(CO)

¶28

/True Copy/

¶29

Sub Assistant Registrar(CS-II)

¶30

¶31

The District Collector, Sivagangai District, Sivagangai.

¶32

The Assistant Director of Agriculture, Block Agricultural Extension Centre, Ilayankudi, Sivagangai District.

¶33

Copy to

¶34

The Registrar (Judicial), Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

¶35

+1 cc to Special Government Pleader, SR.No.98143. VJT/SJ

¶36

DS RSK SAR2 19 12 2018 3P 5C

¶37

W.P. (MD) No. 22737 of 2018 30.11.2018

¶38

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

N.Muthukumar, v. the District Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

N.Muthukumar, v. the District Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

D.Raju, Vs the Government of Tamil Nadu

Thirupathi Vs the Joint Registrar / the

M.Xavier Irudayaraj Vs State Rep.by the District

Kala Vs Sudalai

The State of Tamil Nadu Vs S.I.Selvakuamar

D.Ramesh, Foreman Grade-I, Vs the Chief Engineer (Personnel)