Kala v. Sudalai
Case brief
What is this about?
The Civil Miscellaneous Petition filed by the petitioner for condoning delay and setting aside a previous order was dismissed for non-prosecution as the petitioner appeared neither in person nor through an advocate.
What did the court decide?
The Civil Miscellaneous Petition is dismissed.
What the court decided
1
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Civil Appellate Jurisdiction )
Friday, the Thirtieth day of November Two Thousand Eighteen
PRESENT
The Honble Mr.Justice K.K.SASIDHARAN and The Honble Mr.Justice P.D.AUDIKESAVALU
CMP(MD) No.10787 of 2018 IN WA(MD) No.SR43945 of 2018
KALA ... PETITIONER/APPELLANT
Vs
1.SUDALAI
2.ASSISTANT ENGINEER
URBAN DISTRIBUTION, O/O.ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER
(DISTRIBUTION) TANGEDCO SUB STATION CAMPUS, PALAIYAPETTAI, TIRUNELVELI,
TIRUNELVELI DISTRICT.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the civil miscellaneous petition appearing for dismissal be allowed due to non-appearance of the petitioner.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
KALA
- respondent
SUDALAI
- respondent
ASSISTANT ENGINEER, URBAN DISTRIBUTION, TANGEDCO
- respondent
THE JUNIOR ENGINEER, URBAN DISTRIBUTION, TANGEDCO
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court