Writ petition under Article 226 directed to be dismissed for non-prosecution as no representation was made by the petitioner despite subsequent postings.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 03.08.2018 CORAM : THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R. MAHADEVAN W.P.No.9505 of 2010
Veerapuram New Colony Welfare Association, Represented by its Secretary. ... Petitioner
Vs.
Prayer:
Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Mandamus to direct the fourth respondent herein to investigate into the complaint lodged by the petitioner's association with the third respondent on 20.02.2010 are reiterated in the complaint of the petitioner sent to the respondents 1&2 herein on 15.03.2010 and take appropriate action in accordance with law, against the offenders.
For Petitioner : No Appearance For Respondents 1 to 3 : Mr.J. Ramesh Additional Government Pleader
For Respondent - 4 : Mr.N. Chandrasekaran Special Government Pleader
When the writ petition was taken up for hearing on 02.08.2018, there was no representation for the petitioner. Hence, the matter was directed to be posted today i.e, on 03.08.2018, under the caption “for dismissal”. Even today, https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ there is no representation for the petitioner either in person
or through its learned counsel.
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar(CS IX)
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
To
+1cc to Government Pleader SR.NO.54000
sm:28.8.2018
W.P.No.9505 of 2010
Veerapuram New Colony Welfare Association
Director General of Police
R. MAHADEVAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
