R.Saradha, v. Commissioner for Milk and
Case brief
What is this about?
This writ petition challenged the delay in considering the petitioner's Revision Petition regarding an order of recovery. The High Court directed the 1st respondent to decide the Revision Petition on merits within 12 weeks, disposing of the parent writ petition.
What did the court decide?
Direct the 1st respondent to consider the Revision Petition and pass orders on merits within 12 weeks from receipt of this order.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 22.10.2018
CORAM :
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM
W.P.No.8210 of 2013
R.Saradha ... Petitioner
vs.
- Commissioner for Milk and Dairy Development, Madhavaram Milk Colony,
madhavaram, Chennai 600 051.
- Managing Director,
Tamil Nadu Milk Co-operative Milk Producers
Federation Limited,
Ambattur Industrial Estate,
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petitioner is entitled to a determination of her Revision Petition pending before the 1st respondent.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
R. Saradha
- respondent
Commissioner for Milk and Dairy Development
- respondent
Managing Director, Tamil Nadu Milk Co-operative Milk Producers Federation Limited
- respondent
Joint Managing Director, Tamil Nadu Co-operative Milk Producer's Federation Limited
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court