This court dismissed a writ petition challenging a District Consumer Forum order as an abuse of the constitutional process, observing that the petitioner had already exhausted remedies including a Supreme Court special leave petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 12.10.2018 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE. S.M.SUBRAMANIAM W.P.No.14165 of 2016 and M.P.Nos.12391 and 12392 of 2016
Jaicon Construction Private Ltd, Rep by its Managing Directof R. Jeyaraj, No.5-A, 14th East Main Road, Gandhi Nagar, Vellore-632 006. ...Petitioner
-Vs-
1.District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Muthaialpet, Puducherry, Rep. By its President,
2.S.Srinivasan ... Respondents
Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Certiorari to call for the records pertaining to the order passed in Consumer complaint No.6 of 2011 dated 25.01.2012 on the file of the 1st respondent and to quash the same as arbitrary, illegal, irregular and erroneous exercise of jurisdiction.
For petitioner : Mr.H.Nazirudeen
For Respondents For R1 : No appearance
For R2 : Mr.L.Chandrakumar
O R D E R
The present writ petition has been filed challenging the order passed in Consumer complaint No.6 of 2011 dated 25.01.2012 on the file the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Puducherry.
S.M.SUBRAMANIAM.,J
rts
12.10.2018 Internet:Yes/No Index : Yes/No Speaking order/Non-Speaking Order tta/rts
To
The President, District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Muthaialpet, Puducherry.
W.P.No.14165 of 2016 and M.P.Nos.12391 and 12392 of 2016
Jaicon Construction Private Ltd
1. District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Muthaialpet, Puducherry
2. S. Srinivasan
S. M. Subramaniam
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
