The High Court of Judicature at Madras dismissed the writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution as withdrawn at the instance of the petitioner.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 11.04.2018 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SUBBIAH AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.D.AUDIKESAVALU
W.P.No.7868 of 2018
E.M.Karthik
...Petitioner
versus
For Petitioner : Mr.M.Akila For Respondents: Mr.S.Suresh Kumar, Government Advocate
O R D E R
(The Order of the Court was made by R.Subbiah,J.)
Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this writ petition. He has also made an endorsement to that effect.
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar(CS III)
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
vsi
To
1. The District Collector,
Thiruvallur – 602 001.
2. The Revenue Divisional Officer,
Thiruvallur – 602 001.
3. The Village Administrative Officer,
Thiruvallur – 602 001.
W.P.No.7868 of 2018
ks(co)
aa19/04/2018
1 provisions across 1 enactments
E.M. Karthik
District Collector
Revenue Divisional Officer
Village Administrative Officer
R. Subbiah
P.D. Audikesavalu
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
