Indira Vadivelu v. S.Mohana
Case brief
What is this about?
This appeal filed under Order 41 Rule 1 r/w Section 96 CPC against a civil decree was disposed of after the parties entered into a binding settlement during mediation and paid the agreed sum.
What did the court decide?
Appeal suit is disposed of in terms of the memo of settlement dated 07.03.2018; registry directed to refund court fee to appellant's counsel.
What the court decided
In the High Court of Judicature at Madras Dated : 10.04.2018
Coram The Honourable Mr.Justice R.SUBBIAH and
The Hon'ble Mr.Justice P.D.AUDIKESAVALU
A.S.No.386 of 2017 and CMP.No.14418 of 2017
Indira Vadivelu ..Appellant/Defendant
..vs.. S.Mohana ..Respondent/Plaintiff
Appeal Suit has been filed under Order 41, Rule 1 r/w Section 96 of the Civil Procedure Code against the judgment and decree dated 23.02.2017 passed by the learned VII Additional Judge, City Civil Court, Chennai in O.S.No.11350 of 2010.
For Appellant : Mr.L.J.Vengatesh For Respondent : Mr.A.Dhiraviyanathan
JUDGMENT
(Judgment of the Court was delivered by R. SUBBIAH,J.)
The appellant herein is the defendant in O.S.No.11350 of 2010, on the file of the learned VII Additional Judge, City Civil Court, Chennai. The respondent herein has filed the aforesaid suit against the appellant/defendant for the following reliefs:
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether an appeal filed under Order 41 Rule 1 read with Section 96 CPC should be disposed of upon the parties entering into a settlement during mediation.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Indira Vadivelu
- respondent
S.Mohana
Coram
R. SUBBIAH
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court