The High Court of Madras dismissed a writ petition as withdrawn by the petitioner with no costs awarded per the learned counsel's submission.
Writ petition dismissed as withdrawn. No costs awarded to either party.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 05.04.2018
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SUBBIAH
AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.D.AUDIKESAVALU
W.P.No.21419 of 2011
and
M.P.No.1 of 2011
M/s. S.Kaveri Piping Systems Pvt.Ltd., 41, Shed No.714, Nayandhalli, Mysore Road, Bangalore - 560 039 rep. by its Director Rakesh Daga. ... Petitioner versus
Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this writ petition. He has also made an endorsement to that effect.
Sd/-
Asst.Registrar (CO)
/true copy/
Sub Asst. Registrar
vsi
To
The Registrar,
Intellectual Property Appellate Board (IPAB)
Guna Complex Annex-1,
2nd Floor, 443, Anna Salai,
Teynampet,
Chennai - 600 018.
W.P.No.21419 of 2011
SVN(CO)
RRK(22/05/18)
M/s. S.Kaveri Piping Systems Pvt.Ltd.
Jeetendra Lodha (HUF)
The Registrar, Intellectual Property Appellate Board
R.Subbiah
P.D.Audikesavalu
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
