Disposed

A.Abdul Majeed, v. The Superintending Engineer

Madras HC4 Sept 2018WP/6351/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner challenged a provisional assessment order under Article 226. The Court observed that since a final assessment order was subsequently passed, the cause for challenging the provisional order ceased to exist, and the writ petition was closed with no order as to costs.

What did the court decide?

The writ petition stands closed. There shall be no order as to costs. Connected miscellaneous petitions are also closed.

A.Abdul Majeed, Vs The Superintending Engineer — Service and Employment | Madras HC (2018)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED : 04.09.2018

¶3

CORAM :

¶4

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM

¶5

W.P.No.6351 of 2017

¶6

and

¶7

W.MP.Nos.6846 and 6847 of 2017

¶8

A. Abdul Majeed ... Petitioner

¶9

vs.

¶10

The Superintending Engineer, Thirukovilur Electricity Distribution Circle, Thirukovilur, Villupuram District.

¶11

The Assistant Executive Engineer (O&M), TamilNadu Electricity Board, Thiyagadurgam, Villupuram District.

¶12

... Respondents

¶13

Prayer: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, for issuance of a writ of Certiorari calling for the entire records in connection with the impugned order passed by the 2^nd respondent in Lr.No.AEE/O&M/TGM/C1F.APTS/D.No.055 2016 dated 16.11.2016 and to quash the same and grant such other relief.

¶14

For Petitioner : Mr. P. Venkatraman

¶15

For Respondents: Mr.M. Varun Kumar

¶16

O R D E R

¶17

The provisional assessment order issued by the Assistant Executive Engineer to the writ petitioner in proceedings dated 16.11.2016 is under challenged in this writ petition.

¶18

The learned counsel for the petitioner states that, Rs.50,000/- of the amount had already been deposited by the writ petitioner with the respondent board. On the perusal of the impugned order, it is stated that the writ petitioner in the event of any objection would submit the same in respect of the provisional assessment made in the impugned proceedings dated 16.11.2016.

¶19

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶20

However, now it is brought to the notice of this Court by the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent that the process of receiving objections were completed and final assessment order has been passed in respect of the case of the writ petitioner in proceeding dated 07.12.2016.

¶21

In view of the order of final assessment the cause arose for filing of the present writ petition challenging the provisional assessment order became vanished.

¶22

Thus the writ petition stands closed. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are also closed.

¶23

Sd/-
Assistant Registrar(CS V)
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
pkn
To
1. The Superintending Engineer,
Thirukovilur Electricity Distribution Circle,
Thirukovilur,
Villupuram District.
2. The Assistant Executive Engineer (O&M),
TamilNadu Electricity Board,
Thiyagadurgam,
Villupuram District.
+1cc to Mr.M.Varunkumar, Advocate SR.NO.61706
sm:24.9.2018

¶24

W.P.No.6351 of 2017 and W.MP.Nos.6846 and 6847 of 2017

¶25

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

A.Abdul Majeed, v. The Superintending Engineer

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

A.Abdul Majeed, v. The Superintending Engineer

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

V.Baskaran, Vs The Commissioner

Mrs.M.Chellamal, Vs The Principal Secretary to

Dr.S.D.Dineshkumar Vs The Registrar

T.Namasivayam Vs Tmt. M.K.S. Subashini

The Government Vs The Chairman and Managing

R.Punitha Vs The Superintendent Engineer