obtained without under going the regular educational pattern of 10+2+3+2 are not a valid qualifications and all such degrees granted without undergoing the regular pattern of education, prescribed by the University Grants Commission, cannot be accepted for the purpose of public appointment. Thus, this Court is of an opinion that the writ petitioner's post of Assistant Professor cannot be construed as mere a public post. It is the specialized public post wherein the academic qualifications are very much relevant and important for the purpose of imparting education to the students, studying in the Universities and Colleges. Therefore, the person, who had undergone the higher education through regular course in a College or University alone are eligible for public appointment as Assistant Professors or Professor in the University or College. Even the persons who have studied in correspondence courses, cannot be made eligible for appointment to the post of Assistant Professor or Professor in College or University. Such those person, who had undergone the regular pattern of education through correspondence courses can be considered for the purpose of appointments in other Government Departments or Government organization for ministerial posts or administrative posts. However, such persons, who have undergone higher education in correspondence courses, can never be appointed as Assistant Professor or Professor or in any teaching faculty in the Universities or in colleges. In respect of colleges and universities, the persons, who have studied in the regular course in the regular college, alone should be considered for appointment and that is the very purpose and object of the University Grants Commission and the Act itself.
