This High Court directed the Appellate Authority (2nd respondent) to treat the petitioner's application as an appeal, dispose of it on merits with an opportunity of hearing, and complete the task within eight weeks.
Second respondent directed to treat petitioner's application as an appeal, afford hearing, and dispose on merits within eight weeks.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 20.08.2018
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.MAHADEVAN
W.P.No.427 of 2014
R.Saravanakumar ... Petitioner
1.The Registrar, Information Commission, No.2, Thiyagaraya Salai, Teynampet, Chennai 600 018.
2.The Appellate Authority, Office of the Superintendent of Police, Dharmapuri District, Dharmapuri.
3.The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Harur, Dharmapuri District. ... Respondents
PRAYER : Petition filed under Article 226 of The Constitution of India praying to issue a writ of mandamus directing the 2nd respondent to treat the petitioner's application dated 21.06.2013 as an appeal as directed by the 1st respondent by his proceedings in Order No.28955/F/2013 dated 01.10.2013 and to dispose of the same within a time frame.
Additional Government Pleader
The petitioner has come up with this writ petition seeking a direction to the second respondent to treat the petitioner's application dated 21.06.2013 as an appeal as directed by the 1st respondent by his proceedings in Order No.28955/F/2013 dated 01.10.2013 and to dispose of the same within a time frame.
claiming the same relief. Thereafter, the first respondent by his proceedings in Order No.28955/F/2013 dated 01.10.2013, directed the second respondent to treat the petitioner's application dated 21.06.2013 as an appeal and dispose of the same on merits. but, the said application is yet to be disposed of by the second respondent. However, the learned counsel submitted that it would suffice, if the application dated 21.06.2013 made by the petitioner is directed to be considered by the second respondent, on merits.
W.P.No.427 of 2014
GJII(CO)
SP(17/09/2018)
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the second respondent should be directed to consider the petitioner's application dated 21.06.2013 as an appeal on merits.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
R.Saravanakumar
The Registrar, Information Commission, No.2, Thiyagaraya Salai, Teynampet, Chennai 600 018
The Appellate Authority, Office of the Superintendent of Police, Dharmapuri District, Dharmapuri
The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Harur, Dharmapuri District
R.MAHDEEVAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
