Disposed

Smt.S.Muthulakshmi, v. State of Tamil Nadu

Madras HC7 Mar 2018WP/4180/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Writ petition challenging non-inclusion of the petitioner in the TNSET 2018 revised notification. Court directed respondents to permit the petitioner to write the test. Petitioner submitting compliance, Court disposed of the petition and directed declaration of results upon payment of fees.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner permitted to write TNSET 2018; writ petition disposed; respondents directed to declare petitioner's result on payment of fee.

Smt.S.Muthulakshmi, Vs State of Tamil Nadu — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Madras HC (2018)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED :07.03.2018

¶3

CORAM

¶4

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE R.MAHADEVAN

¶5

W.P.No.4180 of 2018 and

¶6

W.M.P.No.5127 of 2018

¶7

Smt.S.Muthulakshmi ..Petitioner

¶8

vs 1.State of Tamil Nadu, Represented by its Principal Secretary/Convenor, Department of Higher Education,

¶9

Fort St.George, Chennai – 600 009.

¶10

2.The Registrar/Member Secretary TNSET 2018, Mother Teresa Women's University, Kodaikanal – 624 101.

¶11

3.The University Grants Commission, Represented by the Secretary, Bahadursha Zafar Marg, New Delhi – 110 002. .. Respondents

¶12

Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the 2^nd respondent to allow the petitioner to participate the revised notification for Tamil Nadu State Eligibility Test (TNSET 2018) for Assistant Professor 23.02.2018 and 01.02.2018 and further proceedings also.

¶13

For Petitioner : M/s.R.S.Krishnaswamy For Respondents : M/s.A.Rajaperumal AGP for R1 M/s.M.Elumalai for R2 M/s.P.R.Gopinathan for R3 O R D E R

¶14

This writ petition has been filed for a Mandamus, directing the 2^nd respondent to permit the petitioner to participate in the revised notification for Tamil Nadu State Eligibility Test (TNSET 2018) for Assistant Professor.

¶15

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶16

2.On 01.03.2018, when the matter was taken up for consideration, this Court, after considering the submissions made by the parties and upon perusal of the documents produced before the same, has directed the respondents to permit the petitioner to write the TNSET 2018 for Assistant Professor, held on 04.03.2018.

¶17

3.Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned counsel for the petitioner, on instructions, submits that as directed by this Court, the petitioner was permitted to write the said Test and hence, the relief sought for in this writ petition has been granted by the respondents.

¶18

4.This Court is of the opinion that in view of the submission so made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, nothing survives for adjudication. However, the respondents are directed to declare the result of the petitioner on payment of necessary fee by way of demand draft, if not already paid, by the petitioner.

¶19

5.Accordingly, this writ petition stands disposed of. No
costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed.
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
rk
To
1.The Principal Secretary/Convenor,
State of Tamil Nadu,
Department of Higher Education,
Fort St.George, Chennai – 600 009.
+1cc to Mr.R.S.Krishnaswamy, Advocate, S.R.No.17630
+1cc to Mr.P.R.Gopinathan, Advocate, S.R.No.17500
+1cc to the Government Pleader, S.R.No.17771

¶20

W.P.No.4180 of 2018 RJ(CO) RRK(11/04/2018)

¶21

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Smt.S.Muthulakshmi, v. State of Tamil Nadu

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Smt.S.Muthulakshmi, v. State of Tamil Nadu

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M.Rajendran, Vs The Regional Manager

A.Dilsath Begam, Vs The State of Tamil Nadu

V.Narasimman, 27 Yrs, Vs State Rep

Gandhiji Primary School,Rep by Vs District Elementary Educationa

Hindu Middle School Vs The Director of Elementary

Parent Teacher Association, Vs The Director of School