This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 20.12.2018
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE Mr. JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM
W.P.No.30958 of 2005
and MP.No.33940 of 2005
B.Veeraraghavan ....Petitioner vs
Villivakkam, Chennai – 600 049.
Prayer: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the first respondent to provide separate electricity service connection to the petitioner shop premises bearing No.20, Baliamman Koil Street, Villivakkam, Chennai – 600 049.
For Petitioner : Mr.K.Ramesh, for Mr.L.Dhamodaran
For Respondents : Mr.P.R.Dhilip Kumar,
Standing Counsel, for R1 Mr.V.Bhiman, for M/s.Sampath Kumar Association for R2
When the matter was taken up for consideration, the learned counsel appearing on both sides, on instructions, submitted that the relief sought for herein has become infructuous and hence, nothing survives for adjudication in the present writ petition.
miscellaneous petition is also closed.
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
Pkn
To
The Assistant Engineer,
O & M/CEDC/North,
Villivakkam, Chennai – 600 049.
+1 cc to M/s.Sampath Kumar & Association, Advocate SR.No.89133
W.P.No.30958 of 2005
CP(CO)
CSL/11.01.2019
B.Veeraraghavan
The Assistant Engineer, O & M/CEDC/North
V.Kasturi
S.M.Subramaniam
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
