Gurunathan v. the Chairman
Case brief
What is this about?
Single judge order where the High Court of Judicature at Madras dismissed W.P. No. 28317 of 2005 filed by Gurunathan for non-prosecution as there was no appearance from the petitioner during hearings.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 20.12.2018
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE Mr. JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM
W.P.No. 28317 of 2005 W.P.M.P.No.30822 of 2005
Gurunathan .. Petitioner
Vs
1.The Chairman,
Tamil Nadu Electricity Board,
Anna Salai,
Chennai.2
2.The Assistant Engineer,
Operation and Maintenance,
Tamil Nadu Electricity Board,
Lolathur – 638 303. ..Respondents
PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records pertaining to K.N.UPO/E. Tha.Pa/V/Ko/Ko.4.Manu/A.No.3342/04 dated 04.12.2004 on the file of the second respondent and quash the order passed therein and direct the respondents to effect the electricity connection free of costs after completing all the formalities.
For Petitioner : No Appearance For Respondents : Mr.P.R.DhilipKumar
O R D E R
When the writ petition was taken for hearing on 19.12.2018, there was no representation for the petitioner. Hence, the matter is posted today, i.e. on 20.12.2018, under the caption “For Dismissal”.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Gurunathan
- respondent
The Chairman, Tamil Nadu Electricity Board
- respondent
The Assistant Engineer, Operation and Maintenance, Tamil Nadu Electricity Board
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court