Dismissed

Wincy Blue Metal, v. The Assistant Accounts Officer

Madras HC27 Aug 2018WP/30617/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a writ petition for restoration of electricity connection, the Court directed the petitioner to pay arrears and submit a No Objection Certificate before the respondents consider the matter for service reconnection.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner directed to pay arrears and submit NOC; upon compliance, respondents to consider connection request within two weeks.

Wincy Blue Metal, Vs The Assistant Accounts Officer — Service and Employment | Madras HC (2018)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 27.08.2018 CORAM

¶2

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.MAHADEVAN

¶3

W.P.No.30617 of 2017 & W.M.P.No.33518 of 2017

¶4

Wincy Blue Metal
No.3, Ganapathy Nagar,
1st Street,
Kamarajapuram,
Anagaputhur,
Chennai-600070.
Rep. by its Proprietor
T.Chinthadurai. ... Petitioner
Vs
1. The Assistant Accounts Officer,
Chennai Electricity,
Division Circle/South,
Pallavaram,
Revenue Branch,
Pallavaram,
Chennai-600043.
2. The Chairman,
Tamil Nadu Electricity Board, TANGED CO.,
Mound Road,
Chennai - 60002.

¶5

... Respondents

¶6

PRAYER : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the first respondent to restore electricity supply to the electricity connection numbers 1. 258-10-821 and 2. 258-01-0-469 standing in the name of Amaralingam duly extended to the petitioner unit namely, Wincy Blue Metal functioning at SF No.144/1, Pammal Village, Alandur Taluk, Kancheepuram District on payment of arrears, reconnection charges and minimum charges payable for the period of non-use.

¶7

For Petitioner : Mr.D.Ashok Kumar For Respondents: Mr.S.K.Rameshwar, for R1 & R2

¶8

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶9

ORDER

¶10

The prayer made in this writ petition is to issue a mandamus, directing the first respondent to restore electricity supply to the service connection nos.258-10-821 and 258-01-0-469 standing in the name of one Amaralingam which was duly extended to the petitioner unit namely, Wincy Blue Metal functioning at SF No.144/1, Pammal Village, Alandur Taluk, Kancheepuram District on payment of arrears, reconnection charges and minimum charges payable for the period of non-use.

¶11

2.On notice and due instructions, the learned counsel for the respondents fairly submitted that the case of the petitioner be considered by the respondents, subject to payment of arrears as well as by production of No Objection Certificate (NOC) from the department concerned.

¶12

3.Such statement made by the learned counsel for the respondents has not been refuted by the learned counsel for the petitioner.

¶13

4.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and having regard to the submissions made by the learned counsel on either side, this Court directs the petitioner to pay the arrears as well as to produce the NOC obtained from the department concerned to the respondents and on such compliance, the respondents shall consider the same and pass appropriate orders, with regard to service connection to the petitioner Unit, within a period of two weeks thereafter.

¶14

5.With the above directions, this Writ Petition is disposed of. No costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed.

¶15

Sd/-

¶16

Assistant Registrar(CS IV)

¶17

//True Copy//

¶18

Sub Assistant Registrar

¶19

dna

¶20

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶21

¶22

The Assistant Accounts Officer,
Chennai Electricity,
Division Circle/South,
Pallavaram,
Revenue Branch,
Pallavaram,
Chennai-600043.
2. The Chairman,
Tamil Nadu Electricity Board, TANGED CO.,
Mound Road,
Chennai - 60002.
+1cc to Mr.D.Ashok Kumar, Advocate SR.NO.58783
SJ(CO)
sm:29.8.2018
W.P.No.30617 of 2017
&
W.P.M.P.No.33518 of 2017

¶23

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Wincy Blue Metal, v. The Assistant Accounts Officer

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Wincy Blue Metal, v. The Assistant Accounts Officer

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

E.I.D Parry (India) Ltd, Sugar Vs The Union of India

K.M.Viswanathan, Vs The Inspector of Police

T.v.Prabhakaran, Vs The District Revenue officer

P.Ganesan Vs The Passport Officer

Sundari, Vs The District Collector

V.Mallika Vs the Revenue Divisional Officer