Disposed

Sundari, v. The District Collector

Madras HC27 Aug 2018WP/10459/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Court directed the petitioner to submit missing documents to the District Social Welfare Office within one week. It directed the respondent to consider the application on merits and pass appropriate orders under the relevant scheme within two weeks thereafter, disposing of the writ petition.

What did the court decide?

Directed petitioner to submit missing documents within one week; directed second respondent to consider application on merits within two weeks.

Sundari, Vs The District Collector — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Madras HC (2018)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED : 27.08.2018

¶3

CORAM

¶4

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.MAHADEVAN

¶5

W.P.No.10459 of 2018 & W.M.P.No.12409 of 2018

¶6

Sundari ... Petitioner
Vs.
1.The District Collector
Salem Collector Office
Salem.
2.The District Social Welfare Office
3 rd Floor, District Collector Office Campus
Salem District,
Salem. ... Respondents

¶7

PRAYER : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Certiorari, calling for the records relating to the proceedings of the rejection order in application ID.No.2016/0301/08/007636 dated nil (through online) on the file of the second respondent quash the same.

¶8

For Petitioner : Mr.K.A.Prabaharan For Respondents: Mrs.P.Rajalakshmi

¶9

Additional Government Pleader

¶10

O R D E R

¶11

Challenging the rejection order passed by the second respondent, the petitioner has came up with the present writ petition.

¶12

The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that to get the benefit under the Moovalur Ramamirtham Ammiar Scheme, vide G.O.Ms.No.49, Social Welfare and Noon Meals Scheme (Sa.Na.3) Department, dated 26.07.2011, pursuant to the marriage of the petitioner's daughter, the petitioner made an

¶13

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶14

application through online on 28.10.2016 enclosing all the required certificates. However, the said application was not considered by the respondents.

¶15

Mrs.P.Rajalakshmi, learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the respondents, on instructions, submitted that certain documents have not been enclosed in the application submitted by the petitioner and hence, his claim was not considered by the authority concerned. However, the learned Additional Government Pleader submitted that if the petitioner submits the required documents, her application said to have been made through online on 28.10.2016, would be considered by the second respondent, on merits, which has been agreed by the learned counsel for the petitioner.

¶16

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and having regard to the submissions made by the learned counsel on either side, this Court directs the petitioner to submit all the required documents to the second respondent within a period of one week from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. On such submission, the second respondent shall consider the same and pass appropriate orders on merits and in accordance with law and also in line with G.O.Ms.No.49, Social Welfare and Noon Meals Scheme (Sa.Na.3) Department, dated 26.07.2011, within a period of two weeks thereafter.

¶17

With the above directions, this Writ Petition is disposed of. No costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed.

¶18

Sd/Assistant Registrar(CS-II) //True Copy//

¶19

Sub Assistant Registrar dna

¶20

¶21

1.The District Collector Salem Collector Office Salem.

¶22

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶23

2.The District Social Welfare Office

¶24

3^rd Floor, District Collector Office Campus Salem District, Salem.

¶25

+1cc to Mr.K.A.PRABAKARAN, Advocate, S.R.No.58673 +1cc to the Government Pleader, S.R.No.57537

¶26

W.P.No.10459 of 2018
&
W.M.P.No.12409 of 2018
SJ(CO)
TR(29/08/2018)

¶27

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Sundari, v. The District Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sundari, v. The District Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

E.I.D Parry (India) Ltd, Sugar Vs The Union of India

K.M.Viswanathan, Vs The Inspector of Police

T.v.Prabhakaran, Vs The District Revenue officer

P.Ganesan Vs The Passport Officer

V.Mallika Vs the Revenue Divisional Officer

Wincy Blue Metal, Vs The Assistant Accounts Officer