P.G.Sambantham v. the Commissioner
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner sought writ to restrain removal of a Neem Tree and temple. Court noted temple removed and tree not removing petition closed.
What did the court decide?
Writ petition closed; no costs awarded.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 05.12.2018
CORAM:
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE V.BHARATHIDASAN
W.P.No.2958 of 2014 and W.M.P.No. 1 of 2014
P.G.Sambantham ... Petitioner
Vs.
- The Commissioner, Corporation of Chennai, Rippon Building, Chennai -3
- The Executive Engineer, Corporation of Chennai, Zone 6, Division 68, Paper Mills Road, Perambur, Chennai - 11.
- The Inspector of Police, K-9, Police Station, 12/25, Sathiya Narayana Street, T.V.K.Nagar, Chenani - 11.
- G.Devaraj ... Respondents
PRAYER : Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus forbearing the respondents from removing the Holy Neem Tree and Temple situated at dead end of the Appa Rao Garden 1st street, Anbazhagan Nagar, T.V.K.Nagar, Chennai -11 and further forbearing the 1st respondent from permitting the 4th respondent to put up rear entrance to the premises situated at No.12/25, Sathiyanarayana Street, Anbazhagan Nagar, T.V.K.Nagar, Chennai – 11.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
P.G. Sambantham
- respondent
Commissioner, Corporation of Chennai
- respondent
Executive Engineer, Corporation of Chennai, Zone 6
- respondent
Inspector of Police, K-9
- respondent
G. Devaraj
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court