Dismissed

Mrs.Palaniammal v. the District Revenue Officer

Madras HC4 Dec 2018WP/4060/2014

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In this special government petitioner order, the Court dismissed a writ petition filed under Article 226 seeking direction to dispose of a tax appeal. The Special Government Pleader for the respondent submitted that the appellant name the petition had already been disposed of by the lower authority eight years prior. Consequently, the Court found no substantive matter left for adjudication. The pe

What the court decided

AI extract

Mrs.Palaniammal Vs the District Revenue Officer — Writ and Judicial Review | Madras HC (2018)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED: 04.12.2018

¶3

CORAM:

¶4

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE V.BHARATHIDASAN

¶5

M.P.No. 1 of 2014

¶6

Mrs.Palaniammal ... Petitioner

¶7

Vs.
1. The District Revenue Officer,
Perambalur.
2. The Revenue Divisional Officer,
Perambalur.
3. The Tahsildar,
Kunnam Taluk, Perambalur District.
4. Mr. Duraisamy Udaiyar ... Respondents

¶8

PRAYER : Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the first respondent to dispose of the appeal bearing A.No.B2/16011/2013 filed by the petitioner within a time frame fixed by this Court in pursuant to the order of the 2nd respondent dated 07.10.2013 bearing No.Mu.Mu.A2/4959/2013.

¶9

For Petitioner : Mr. G.Ilamurugu

¶10

For Respondents : Mr R.Govindasamy

¶11

Spl. G.P. O R D E R

¶12

This writ petition has been filed seeking direction to the first respondent to dispose the appeal filed by the petitioner challenging the order passed by the second respondent, Revenue Divisional Officer.

¶13

The grievance of the petitioner is that the petitioner is said to have filed an appeal before the first respondent on 28.10.2013 and the same was not disposed of till date. Hence, the present writ petition has been filed.

¶14

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶15

Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned Special Government Pleader appearing for the first respondent submitted that the appeal filed by the petitioner has already been disposed of by the first respondent by an order dated 01.08.2016. He has also produced the copy of the order.

¶16

Considering the fact that already the appeal filed by the petitioner was disposed of by the first respondent, nothing remains for adjudication. Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed. However, it is always open to the petitioner to challenge the same in the manner known to law. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

¶17

s/d-
Assistant Registrar(CS VI)
True Copy
Sub-Assistant Registrar
mrp
To
1. The District Revenue Officer,
Perambalur.
2. The Revenue Divisional Officer,
Perambalur.
3. The Tahsildar,
Kunnam Taluk, Perambalur District.
+1 CC to Mr.G. Ilamurugu, Advocate sr 84119.
+1 CC to Govt. Pleader sr 83716, 80404.0

¶18

W.P.No. 4060 of 2014

¶19

RSV(CO) SP(01/02/2019)

¶20

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Mrs.Palaniammal v. the District Revenue Officer

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

Mrs.Palaniammal v. the District Revenue Officer

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Bay Resorts Ltd, Vs the Tahsildhar

N.C.Vijayakumar Vs the Government of Tamilnadu

St.Antonys Church, Vs the Inspector of Police

R.Kennedy, Vs the Secretary to Government

Good Shepherd Convent Vs The Secretary

P.Kumaran Vs The Chairman