N.Arumugam v. the Commissioner of Technical
Case brief
What is this about?
A writ petition seeking quashing of an order and continuous payment of pay scale was dismissed as withdrawn by the petitioner.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 04.12.2018
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE V.BHARATHIDASAN
W.P. 3714 of 2014
and
M.P. 2 of 2014
N.Arumugam ... Petitioner
Vs.
1. The Commissioner of Technical
Education, Guindy,
Chennai-600 025.
2. The Principal,
Natchimuthu Polytechnic,
Makkinaickenpatti,
Pollachi Post – 642 003.
Coimbatore District. ... Respondents
PRAYER : Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records in pursuant to the impugned order issued by the 2nd respondent in Proceeding B2/63/2012 dated 22.11.2013 and quash the same and consequently pay the scale of pay of Rs.15,600-39100+AGP Rs.7000 continuously.
For Petitioner : Mr.R.Prem Narayan
The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the Writ Petition and he has also made endorsement to that effect.
In view of the submission and endorsement made by the learned Counsel appearing for the Petitioner, the Writ Petition
is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. Consequently, connected writ miscellaneous petition is closed.
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar(CS-III)
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
rpp
To
The Commissioner of Technical
Education, Guindy,
Chennai-600 025.
+1cc to Mr.R.Prem Narayan, Advocate, S.R.No. 83199
W.P. 3714 of 2014
and
M.P. 2 of 2014
RK(CO)
GN(31/12/2018)
N.Arumugam
The Commissioner of Technical Education, Guindy
The Principal, Natchimuthu Polytechnic
V. Bharathidasan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court