The writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for a writ of Mandamus was dismissed for non-prosecution as there was no appearance by the petitioner on the day the matter was posted for dismissal. The connected miscellaneous petition was also closed. No costs were awarded.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 01.08.2018
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R. MAHADEVAN
W.P.No.27226 of 2010 and
M.P.No.1 of 2010
P. Palanisamy ... Petitioner Vs. The Sub-Registrar Taluk Office Building, Kangeyam, Tirupur District. ... Respondent Prayer:
Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Mandamus to direct the respondent to register the sale deed dated 08.10.2010 presented by the petitioner without insisting for No Due Certificate from any one and consequently to release the document to the petitioner without any encumbrance.
For Petitioner : No Appearance For Respondent : Mr.P.P. Purushothaman Government Advocate ***** O R D E R
When the writ petition was taken up for hearing on 27.07.2018, there was no representation for the petitioner. Hence, the matter was directed to be posted today i.e, on 01.08.2018, under the caption “for dismissal”. Even today, there is no representation for the petitioner either in person or through his learned counsel.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
P. Palanisamy
The Sub-Registrar Taluk Office Building, Kangeyam, Tirupur District
R. MAHADEVAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
