Writ petition filed for certiorari and quashing of a specific Bar Council resolution. The court disposed of the petition by relying on judgments delivered earlier on the same day regarding similar issues, resulting in no costs and closure of related petitions.
No costs. Connected writ miscellaneous petitions closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 05.02.2018
CORAM
The HON'BLE MS.INDIRA BANERJEE, CHIEF JUSTICE AND The HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE
W.P.No.2398 of 2018
and WMP.Nos.2917 & 2918 of 2018
G.V.Vairam Santhosh .. Petitioner
vs.
1.The Bar Council of Tamilnadu & Puducherry,
rep. by its Chairman,
High Court Campus,
Chennai – 600 104.
2.The Bar Council of India,
rep. by its Chairman,
21, Rose Avenue Institutional Area,
Near Bal Bhawan,
New Delhi – 110 002. .. Respondents
PRAYER : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the
Constitution of India for issuance of a writ of certiorari,
calling for records pertaining to the Resolution No.117 of
2018 dated 24.01.2018 on the file of the 1 st respondent and
quash the same.
For Petitioner : Mr.P.Puhazh Gandhi
For Respondents : Mrs.Selvi George for 1st respondent
Mr.S.R.Raghunathan for 2nd respondent
ORDER
(Order of the Court was made by the Hon'ble Chief Justice)
The issues involved in this writ petition are similar to the issues in the public interest litigation being W.P.No.2041 of 2018 (G.Selvakumar v. Bar Council of India and two others) disposed of by a judgment and/or order delivered earlier today. The aforesaid judgment and/or order shall govern this writ petition, which stands disposed of. No costs. Consequently, WMP.Nos.2917 & 2918 of 2018 are closed.
Sd/-
Deputy Registrar
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
bbr
To:
1.The Chairman,
Bar Council of Tamilnadu & Puducherry,
High Court Campus,
Chennai – 600 104.
2.The Chairman,
Bar Council of India,
21, Rose Avenue Institutional Area,
Near Bal Bhawan,
New Delhi – 110 002.
W.P.No.2398 of 2018
RRK(20/02/2018)
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
G.Selvakumar v. Bar Council of India and two othersFollowed¶12
W.P.No.2041 of 2018
1 provisions across 1 enactments
G.V.Vairam Santhosh
The Bar Council of Tamilnadu & Puducherry
The Bar Council of India
MS.INDIRA BANERJEE
MR.JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
