Writ petition filed under Article 226 seeking quashing of a G.O. and conducting second round of counselling was dismissed as non-prosecution due to absence of the petitioner.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED:12.03.2018
CORAM:
THE HON'BLE Mr. JUSTICE R.MAHADEVAN Writ Petition No.23186 of 2017 and WMP Nos.24287 & 24288 of 2017
P.Kalanidhi ... Petitioner ..vs..
Higher Education Department,
Fort St. George, Chennai
Prayer:Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records in G.O. Ms. No.52 (Higher Education (J1) Department) dated 18.03.2003 issued by the 1st respondent quash the same so far as the petitioner is concerned and consequently direct the 2nd respondent to conduct 2nd round of counselling and thereby direct the 2nd respondent to permit the petitioner to attend the 2nd round of counselling.
For Petitioner : No Appearance For R-1 : Mr. C.Munusamy, Spl.G.P., (Edn) For R-2 : Mr. M.Vijayakumar, SPC., O R D E R
When the case was taken up for hearing on 07.03.2018, there was no representation for the petitioner herein. Hence, the matter was directed to be posted to today, i.e., on 12.03.2018 under the caption “For Dismissal”.
Sd/-
Deputy Registrar
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
To
sm:4.4.2018
Writ Petition No.23186 of 2017
and WMP Nos.24287 & 24288 of 2017
1 provisions across 1 enactments
P. Kalanidhi
The Secretary to Government, Higher Education Department
The Secretary, Tamil Nadu Engineering Admissions, Anna University
Mr. Justice R. Mahadevan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
