Disposed

T.Sampathkumar, v. The District Collector

Madras HC9 Mar 2018WP/5398/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This single-paragraph order in a writ petition directed the 2nd respondent to consider the petitioner's representation regarding vocational institutions and pass orders on merits after a personal hearing within six weeks, disposing of the petition without adjudicating the merits.

What did the court decide?

Directed the 2nd respondent to consider the petitioner's representation and pass appropriate orders after affording an opportunity of personal hearing within six weeks.

T.Sampathkumar, Vs The District Collector — Public Procurement and Tenders | Madras HC (2018)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED :09.03.2018

¶3

CORAM

¶4

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE R.MAHADEVAN

¶5

W.P.No.5398 of 2018

¶6

and WMP.No.6636 of 2018

¶7

T.Sampathkumar, Chairman V.C.V.R.T.Educational Council, No.10A, Chinnappan Street, Vishwa Nagar, Manjakuppam, Cudalore District. .. Petitioner vs 1.The District Collector, Nagappatinam District, Nagappatinam.

¶8

2.The Joint Director, Medical Services, Nagappatinam District, Nagappatinam.

¶9

3.The Superintendent of Police, Nagappatinam District, Nagappatinam. . .Respondents

¶10

Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of mandamus directing the 2^nd respondent to consider the petitioner's representation dated 05.02.2018 for not to disturb the Vocational, Self Employment Skill Training, Institutions who are affiliated with the petitioner in Nagappatinam District.

¶11

For Petitioner : Mr.M.Punitha Devakumar For Respondents : Mr.C.Munusamy, Special Government Pleader (Edn.)

¶12

O R D E R

¶13

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶14

The prayer made in the writ petition is to direct the 2^nd respondent to consider the petitioner's representation dated 05.02.2018 and not to disturb the Vocational, Self Employment Skill Training, Institutions, who are affiliated with the petitioner, in Nagappatinam District.

¶15

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the

¶16

learned Special Government Pleader for the respondents.

¶17

Considering the nature of the relief sought for herein, this Court, without going into the merits of the case, directs the second respondent to consider the petitioner's representation dated 05.02.2018 and pass appropriate orders on merits and as per law after affording an opportunity of personal hearing to the petitioner within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶18

Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. No costs.
Consequently connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar(CO)
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
sk/abr
To
1.The District Collector,
Nagappatinam District,
Nagappatinam.
2.The Joint Director,
Medical Services,
Nagappatinam District,
Nagappatinam.
3.The Superintendent of Police,
Nagappatinam District,
Nagappatinam.
+1cc to Mr.M.Punitha Devakumar , Advocate, S.R.No.18153
+1cc to the Government Pleader, S.R.No.18445

¶19

W.P.No.5398 of 2018

¶20

rr(CO) GSP(10/04/2018)

¶21

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

T.Sampathkumar, v. The District Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

T.Sampathkumar, v. The District Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sayar Devi Dhanmull Sowcar Vs The State of Tamil Nadu

B.Barath, S/o.N.Balaji Vs The Assistant Secretary

Vidya Mandir Mlc School Vs State of Tamilnadu

Sri Selva Vignesh Vs The State of Tamilnadu

St. Joseph Matriculation Vs The State of Tamilnadu

Dr.Karthik Sadasivam, Vs Govt. of India