Vs M.Kannan
Case brief
What is this about?
In this second appeal regarding a suit for partition, the High Court dismissed the appeal against the lower courts' finding that the suit property was the separate, self-acquired property of the mother, thereby determining shares based on her death.
What did the court decide?
Second appeal dismissed with costs; family structure determination for partition shares upheld.
What the court decided
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
RESERVED ON : 05.04.2018
PRONOUNCED ON : 12.04.2018
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE T.RAVINDRAN
S.A.No.580 of 2004
M.G.Subramaniam ... Appellant
Vs.
1. M.Kannan
2. M.Saroja
3. M.Renu .... Respondents
Prayer :- Second Appeal has been filed under Section 100 of CPC against the Judgement and Decree dated 03.12.2003 passed in A.S.No.67 of 2003 on the file of the Principal District Court, Vellore, confirming the Judgment and Decree dated 04.07.2003 passed in O.S.No.379 of 1997 on the file of the Principal District Munsif Court, Vellore.
For Appellant : Mr.P.Ganapathy
For Respondents : Mr.N.P.Kumar
JUDGMENT
Issues for consideration
3 issues framed by the court
Whether the suit property is the separate self-acquired property of the mother Thanjiammal or joint family property.
Whether the appellant established the property as ancestral or self-acquired by the father.
Whether the shares allotted to the parties are in accordance with law.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
M.G.Subramaniam
- respondent
M.Kannan
- respondent
M.Saroja
- respondent
M.Renu
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court