Mani v. K.K.Chinnusamy
Case brief
What is this about?
Second Appeal filed by absent appellants was dismissed for non-prosecution. Neither appellants nor respondent appeared on the date of hearing despite listing as absent.
What did the court decide?
Second Appeal dismissed for non-prosecution.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 11.04.2018
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE T.RAVINDRAN
S.A.No.1412 of 2004
1.Mani
2.Subbarayan
3.Kaliannan .. Appellants
Vs
K.K.Chinnusamy .. Respondent
Prayer :- Second Appeal has been filed under Section 100 of C.P.C against the judgment and decree dated 14.11.2002 made in A.S.No.248 of 2002 on the file of the Principal District Judge, Namakkal reversing the judgment and decree dated 26.04.2002 made in O.S.No.156 of 2001 on the file of Additional District Munsif Court, Namakkal.
For the Appellants : No appearance For the Respondent : No appearance
JUDGMENT
This matter was listed on 10.04.2018 and on the appellants being called and remaining absent and finding that no endeavour has been made to proceed with the appeal in accordance with law, Registry was directed to list the matter by printing the name of the appellants in the cause list on 11.04.2018 under the caption " for dismissal."
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Mani
- appellant
Subbarayan
- appellant
Kaliannan
- respondent
K.K.Chinnusamy
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court