permanent injunction sought for by the plaintiffs cannot be granted as against the true owners. The alleged permission said to have been granted to the plaintiffs by the Panchayat Union is incorrect and the said permission, even if, granted, is against law, justice and against the general interest of the public and the Commissioner, Panchayat Union, Ariyalur, has no power to grant any such permission to the plaintiffs and the plaintiffs are only the encroachers into the Government land and it is false to state that the plaintiffs are running a Small Scale Industry Unit in the suit property by obtaining the electric service connection, permission from the necessary authority etc., and running the unit from 1981 onwards. It is false to state that permission had been granted by the revenue department for the plaintiffs to reside in the suit property and thereby, the plaintiffs had obtained water connection to the house portion and electric service connection to the Unit and it is false to state that the second plaintiff had been assessed by way of B memo and paying necessary charges to the Government, the tax receipts produced do not relate to the suit property and it is false to state that the Highways department had given no objection for the Unit run by the plaintiffs and the second plaintiff is paying necessary charges to the Panchayat Union and it is false to state that the plaintiffs have incurred heavy expenses for the construction of the house and running the unit in the suit property. The plaintiffs have suppressed the material facts and ought to have installed the relevant machineries only in his patta land, if any. The plaintiffs are not entitled to raise any construction or unit in the poramboke land belonging to the Government and it is false to state that the defendants are endeavouring to evict the plaintiffs from the suit property at the instigation of the suit villagers and the suit property i.e. pathway poramboke is intended for the use of the entire villagers and the public are going through the suit land for agricultural operations and the entire villagers are taking their cart, cattle through the poramboke land and accordingly, objection had been raised to the encroachment putforth by the plaintiffs and the first plaintiff is employed in the southern railway and the defendants, by resorting to the legal process as directed by law, issued notices to the plaintiffs to evict them from the suit property and as the plaintiffs refused to receive the same, the notices were affixed in the plaintiffs' house and despite the same, the plaintiffs failed to appear before the authorities concerned to place any objection with reference to the notices issued by the defendants and hence, the plaintiffs cannot be allowed to remain in the possession of the suit property as per law and hence, the suit laid by the plaintiffs, without any cause of action, is liable to be dismissed.
