Munnusamy v. Ammani
Case brief
What is this about?
Second appeal dismissed for non-prosecution when the appellant was absent; connected miscellaneous petition closed.
What did the court decide?
Second appeal dismissed with costs. Connected miscellaneous petition closed.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 09.01.2018
CORAM:
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE T.RAVINDRAN
S.A.No.354 of 2003 and C.M.P.No.3275 of 2003
Munnusamy ...Appellant
Vs.
1.Ammani
2.Mani ...Respondents
Prayer: Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of C.P.C.,
against the decree and judgment of Sub Court, Mettur dated
09.07.2002, passed in A.S.No.47 of 2001 on the file of
Subordinate Court, Mettur reversing the Judgment and Decree
dated 03.10.2001 passed in O.S.No.688 of 1996 on the file of the
District Munsiff's Court, Mettur.
For Appellant : No Appearance
For RR1 : Mr.J.Ramakrishnan
J U D G M E N T
Learned counsel for the first respondent present.
2.Learned counsel for the appellant had already reported no instructions and also made an endorsement to that effect and the appellant being called, remaining absent, Registry was directed to list the matter today (i.e) on 09.01.2018, under the caption “for dismissal”, by printing the name of the appellant in the cause list.
2.Today also when the matter is called, there is no representation for the appellant. Appellant called absent.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Munnusamy
- respondent
Ammani
- respondent
Mani
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court