R.Kannan v. S.Ganesa Gounder
Case brief
What is this about?
In this second appeal regarding a civil property dispute, the High Court of Madras dismissed the appeal for non-prosecution as the appellants were absent from the hearing despite proper listing and summoning.
What did the court decide?
The second appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution with costs.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 09.01.2018
CORAM:
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE T.RAVINDRAN
S.A.No.213 of 2003
1.R.Kannan
2.R.Mani
3.N.Lakshmanan ...Plaintiff/Respondent 1-3/Appellants
Vs.
1.S.Ganesa Gounder
2.R.Kaliaperumal (Died)
3.The District Collector,
Villupuram District,
Villupuram.
4.The Tahsildar,
Villupuram.
5.The Commissioner,
Vikravandi Panchayat Union,
Vikravandi.
6.Poongavanam
7.K.Senthil
(R6 and R7 brought on record as LR'S of deceased R2 vide order of Court dated 21.10.2010
made in C.M.P.No.63 of 2010)
... Respondents Prayer: Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of C.P.C., against the decree and judgment dated 30.10.2002 and made in A.S.No.28 of 2001 on the file of Additional District Judge, Villupuram, reversing the Judgment and Decree dated 15.12.2000 made in O.S.No.548 of 1994 on the file of Additional District Munsif, Villupuram.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
R. Kannan
- appellant
R. Mani
- appellant
N. Lakshmanan
- respondent
S. Ganesa Gounder
- respondent
R. Kaliaperumal
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court