S.K.Mary v. Elamuruguselvan
Case brief
What is this about?
Second appeal dismissed for nonprosecution as no representation was made by the appellants on the date of hearing.
What did the court decide?
Second appeal dismissed for nonprosecution with costs; connected miscellaneous petition closed.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 08.01.2018
CORAM:
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE T.RAVINDRAN
S.A.No.1210 of 2003
1.S.K.Mary
2.S.K.Mathivanan ...Appellants/Plaintiffs
Vs.
Elamurugu Selvan
...Respondent/Defendant
Prayer: Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of C.P.C.,
against the decree and judgment of the Additional District
Judges Court, Nagapattinam passed in A.S.No.70 of 1998 dated
01.04.1999 confirming the decree and judgment of the District
Munsif Court, Nagapattinam passed in O.S.No.130 of 1996 dated
31.01.1997.
For Appellants : No Appearance
For Respondent : Mr.M.Vellaisamy
J U D G M E N T
Learned counsel for the respondent present.
2.This second appeal was listed on 05.01.2018, no representation on both sides and the appellants remaining absent on being called, Registry was directed to list the matter today (i.e) on 08.01.2018, under the caption “for dismissal”. 2.Today also when the matter is called, there is no representation for the appellants. Appellants called absent.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
S.K.Mary
- appellant
S.K.Mathivanan
- respondent
Elamurugu Selvan
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court