The Court dismissed the Second Appeal as it had abated following the death of the sole respondent and the appellants' failure to take necessary steps after notice.
The Second Appeal is dismissed as abated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS Dated: 19.12.2018
Coram:
The Honourable Dr.Justice G.JAYACHANDRAN
Second Appeal No.1939 of 2004
PRAYER: This Second Appeal has been filed under Section 100 of Civil Procedure Code, praying against the judgment and decree dated 31.10.2002 made in A.S.No.20 of 2001 on the file of the Subordinate Court, Sankari confirming the Judgment and decree dated 29.06.1998 made in O.S.No.224 of 1992 on the file of the District Munsif Court, Sankari.
For Appellants : Mr.E.Duraivaiyapuri for Mr.N.Manokaran
For Respondent : Mr.P.Jagadeesan J U D G M E N T
The learned counsel for the respondent has already intimated the learned counsel for the appellant regarding demise of the sole respondent and same has been brought to the notice of this Court as early as 12.06.2018. This Court has permitted the learned counsel for the appellant to take appropriate steps. Till date, no steps have been taken.
Sd/Assistant Registrar
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
bsm
To,
1.The Subordinate Judge, Sankari.
2.The District Munsif, Sankari.
Copy To:
The Section Officer,
VR Section,
High Court,
Madras - 104
Second Appeal No.1939 of 2004
KS(CO)
rrs 25/01/2019
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Rathinavel, S/o.Muthusamy Vasantha, W/o.Rathinavel
T.Ganesan
G.JAYACHANDRAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
