This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 18.12.2018 CORAM: THE HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE G.JAYACHANDRAN SECOND APPEAL NO.1817 OF 2004
Annamalai .. Appellant /versus/ 1.Rukmaniyammal 2.Chakravarthy 3.Chidambaram 4.Amsa 5.Lakshmi 6.Sakunthala 7.Ramanujam 8.Rukmani 9.Dhanalakshmi 10.Minor Jayaprakasam 11.Minor Mala 12.Minor.Jayakumar Respondents 10 to 12 rep.by their father and natural guradian Ramanujam the 7th respondent .. Respondents
Second Appeal has been filed under Section 100 of the Civil Procedure Code against the judgment and decree made in A.S.No.52 of 1997, dated 06.11.2002 on the file of the Sub Court, Tirupattur, Vellore District confirming the judgment and decree in O.S.No.1 of 1984 dated 25.02.1997 on the file of the District Munsif Court, Tirupattur.
For Appellant :Mr.V.Jeevagiridharan For Respondents :Mr.R.Siddharth for Mr.T.R.Rajaraman for R1 to R12
The learned counsel appearing for the appellant reported that the sole appellant died.
2.Recording the above submission, this Second Appeal is dismissed as abated. No costs.
Assistant Registrar
True Copy
Sub-Assistant Registrar
3.The Section officer VR Section, High Court, Madras 104. S.A.No.1817 of 2004
SPD(CO) SP(21/01/2019)
Annamalai
Rukmaniyammal
Chakravarthy
Chidambaram
Amsa
Lakshmi
G. Jayachandran
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
