The court dismissed the second appeal filed under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, holding that the matter was withdrawn and not pressed by the appellant's counsel.
Second appeal dismissed as withdrawn and not pressed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 09.01.2018
CORAM:
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE T.RAVINDRAN
S.A. No.1356 of 2003
R.Panneerselvam ... Appellant / Defendant /
Appellant
Vs.
S.S.Nachimuthu Mudaliar ... Respondent / Plaintiff /
Respondent
Prayer:
Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of C.P.C., against
the judgment and decree dated 10.02.2003 in A.S.No.50/2002 on
the file of Principal District Court at Nagapattinam confirming
the judgment and decree dated 22.04.2002 in O.S.No.105/95 on the
file of Additional Sub-ordinate Judges Court, Mayiladuthurai.
For Appellant : M/s.T.Viswanatha Rao
For Respondent : Mr.S.Sounthar
J U D G M E N T
Both counsel present. Learned counsel for the appellant seeks permission to withdraw the second appeal as not pressed. He has also made an endorsement to that effect.
gmd
sd/
ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
/TRUE COPY/
SUB-ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
To
1. The Principal District Judge,
Nagapattinam
2. The Additional Sub-ordinate Judges Court,
Mayiladuthurai.
COPY TO
THE SECTION OFFICER,[2 COPIES]
VR SECTION,
HIGH COURT, MADRAS.
+1CC to M/s.T.Viswanatha Rao Advocate SR.NO.2152
S.A. No.1356 of 2003
SAI[CO]
MK:03/02/2018
1 provisions across 1 enactments
R. Panneerselvam
S.S.Nachimuthu Mudaliar
T. Ravindran
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
