Dismissed
Govindasamy, v. Vadakudi Chathiram Dharmam
Madras HCSA/1301/2004
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS Dated:…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS Dated: 14.12.2018
Coram:
The Honourable Dr.Justice G.JAYACHANDRAN
Second Appeal No.1301 of 2004
Govindasamy, S/o.Murugaiya Vanniar, Vadakudi Chithiram Village, Nagoor Post,
Nagapattinam Taluk & District. ... Appellant/Appellant/Defendant
Vs. Vadakudi Chathiram Dharman Trust, Rep.by its Administrator, Chandirasekaran, S/o.Kandasamy Pillai, Vadakudi Village, Nagapattinam District. ... Respondent/Respondent/Plaintiff PRAYER: This Second Appeal is filed under Section 100 of Civil Procedure Code, praying against the judgment and decree dated 22.03.2004 in A.S.No.121 of 2001 on the file of District Judge, Nagapattinam District, confirming the Judgment and Decree dated 28.09.2001 in O.s.No.99 of 1999 on the file of Additional Subordinate Judge, Nagapattinam.
For Appellant : No appearance For Respondent : Ms.R.Meenal -----J U D G M E N T
No representation for the learned counsel for the appellant. The learned counsel for the respondent would submit that the appellant died on 17.08.2017. It is also stated that connected appeal preferred by the tenant against the landlord/trust has ended in favour of the trust. 2. Accordingly, the Second Appeal is dismissed for nonprosecution. No costs.
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar //True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar bsm
To
3.The Record Keeper,
V.R.Section,
High Court, Madras.
+1cc to Mr.R.Meenal, Advocate, S.R.No.87352
Second Appeal No.1301 of 2004
RJI(CO)
rrs 10/01/2019
GOVINDASAMY
VADAKUDI CHATHIRAM DHARMAN TRUST
JAYACHANDRAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court