M.Thangamuthu v. v.M.Kandasamy
Case brief
What is this about?
Second Appeal for default dismissal. The appellant failed to appear for hearing. The appeal was dismissed without costs. No substantive issues were adjudicated by the Court.
What did the court decide?
dismissed
What the court decided
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Dated:13.12.2018
Coram:
THE HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE G. JAYACHANDRAN
Second Appeal No.564 of 2004
M.Thangamuthu .. Appellant
/versus/
1.V.M.Kandasamy
2.P.Velumani
3.D.Sivakumar
4.Sundaresan Chettiar
5.K.Muruganandam
6.K.Mohanasundaram
7.Lakshmi
8.D.Chinnammal
9.T.Gowrishankar .. Respondents
Second Appeal has been filed under Section 100 of C.P.C., against the
judgment and decree dated 04.12.2003 passed by the Principal District Judge of
Erode at Erode made in A.S.No.65 of 2003 reversing the judgment and decree
dated 28.02.2001 before the Principal District Munsif Court, Erode made in
O.S.No.319 of 1998.
For Appellant :No appearance
For Respondents :Mr.S.Kaithamalaikumaran for R1
R2 to R9- No appearance
--------
2
Dr.G.JAYACHANDRAN,J. ari
J U D G M E N T
Parties & counsel
- appellant
M. Thangamuthu
- respondent
V. M. Kandasamy
Coram
G. Jayachandran
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court