The Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court dismissed a civil revision petition filed under Article 227 challenging the trial court's rejection of a plea for re-issuing a commission warrant due to alleged lack of specific measurements in an old report.
No relief granted; the civil revision petition was dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 19.03.2018
CORAM :
THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE J.NISHA BANU C.R.P.(PD)(MD)No.559 of 2018 and C.M.P.(MD)No.2405 of 2018
1.V.Perumal 2.P.Jayaraman 3.P.Sellappan 4.P.Arumugam 5.P.Ramachandran
... Petitioners / Petitioners / Defendants
vs.
Maruthaiappan ... Respondent / Respondent / Plaintiff
PRAYER: Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, to set aside the fair and decretal order dated 25.10.2017 passed in I.A.No.902 of 2017 in O.S.No.129 of 2011 on the file of the District Munsif Court, Kulithalai.
For Petitioners : Mr.K.Govindarajan
ORDER
This Civil Revision Petition has been filed challenging the order passed by the learned District Munsif, Kulithalai, in I.A.No.902 of 2017 in O.S.No.129 of 2011 dated 25.10.2017.
2
Sd/Assistant Registrar(crl side)
Sub Assistant Registrar
To
The District Munsif, Kulithalai.
+1cc to Mr.K.Govindarajan, Advocate Sr.No.56588
GK
VB/SKN/RSK/SAR4/06.04.2018/2P/3C
C.R.P.(PD)(MD)No.559 of 2018 and C.M.P.(MD)No.2405 of 2018 19.03.2018
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a civil revision petition seeking re-issuance of commission warrant for re-measurement is maintainable after a lapse of seven years without valid reasons.
V.Perumal and others
Maruthaiappan
J.Nisha Banu
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
