Allowed

Hazarath Khader, Aulia Wakf v. Syed Ibrahim Rasheed

Madras HC16 Mar 2018CRP(MD)/567/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Certiorari petition filed to direct the Subordinate Judge, Tiruchirappalli, to dispose of a pending appeal within eight weeks to meet the ends of justice, without adverting to merits. Notice dispensed with. Petition disposed of with direction.

What did the court decide?

Direction issued to the Subordinate Judge, Tiruchirappalli, to dispose of the appeal in A.S.No.13 of 2017 within eight weeks.

Hazarath Khader, Aulia Wakf Vs Syed Ibrahim… — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Madras HC (2018)

¶1

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 16.03.2018

¶3

CORAM :

¶4

THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE J.NISHA BANU C.R.P.(PD)(MD)No.567 of 2018

¶5

Hazarath Khader Aulia Wakf, Tiruchirappalli, Rep. by its Muthawalli, Janaba Mehtaj, Jalal Khudri Street, Madurai Road, Tiruchirappalli -8

¶6

... Petitioner / 1^st Respondent / Plaintiff vs.

¶7

... Respondent / Appellant / 1^st Defendant

¶8

Syed Ibrahim Rasheed

¶9

Tamil Nadu Wakf Board, Rep. by its Chief Executive Officer, No.1, Jaffar Sirang Street, Vallal Seethakadhi Nagar, Chennai – 1.

¶10

... Respondent / 2^nd Respondent / 2^nd Defendant

¶11

PRAYER: Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, to direct the learned Subordinate Judge, Tiruchirappalli to dispose of A.S.No.13 of 2017 against O.S.No.740 of 2013 on the file of the Principal District Munsif Court, Tiruchirappalli, within a time frame as fixed by this Hon'ble Court.

¶12

For Petitioner : Mr.M.Karunanithi

¶13

¶14

ORDER

¶15

This Civil Revision Petition has been filed seeking a direction to the learned Subordinate Judge, Tiruchirappalli, to dispose of the appeal in A.S.No.13 of 2017, within a stipulated time limit.

¶16

Among other things, the learned Counsel for the petitioner/plaintiff would submit that the petitioner, as plaintiff, has filed the suit in O.S.No.740 of 2013 before the Principal District Munsif Court, Tiruchirappalli, for the relief of recovery of possession and other reliefs. The said suit was decreed in favour of the petitioner/plaintiff on 03.11.2016 and challenging the same, the first respondent, as appellant, has https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ filed A.S.No.13 of 2017 before the Sub Court, Tiruchirappalli. Though the appeal was instituted in the year 2017, the same is

¶17

¶18

kept pending without any progress and apprehending some urgency, the petitioner is before this Court seeking a direction for early disposal of the appeal proceedings.

¶19

Heard the learned Counsel for the petitioner and perused

¶20

the materials available on record. Notice to the respondents is dispensed with, since the prayer itself is for a limited scope seeking early disposal of the appeal proceedings.

¶21

Though the appeal is of the year 2017, considering the facts and circumstances of the case and also the fact that the suit is of the year 2013, this Court is of the view that ends of justice will be met if a direction is issued to the learned Judge for early disposal of the appeal proceedings. Accordingly, without adverting into the merits of the case, the learned Subordinate Judge, Tiruchirappalli, is directed to dispose of the appeal in A.S.No.13 of 2017 within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶22

With the above direction, this Civil Revision Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs.

¶23

Sd/-

¶24

Assistant Registrar(CS-III)

¶25

/True Copy/

¶26

Sub Assistant Registrar

¶27

¶28

1.The Principal District Munsif Court, Tiruchirappalli.

¶29

2.The Subordinate Judge, Tiruchirappalli.

¶30

+1cc to Mr.M.Karunanithi, Advocate Sr.No.56403

¶31

¶32

VB/JC/SAR1/03.04.2018/2P/4C

¶33

C.R.P.(PD)(MD)No.567 of 2018 16.03.2018

¶34

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Hazarath Khader, Aulia Wakf v. Syed Ibrahim Rasheed

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Hazarath Khader, Aulia Wakf v. Syed Ibrahim Rasheed

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Dr.S.Narayanan, Vs Dr.Mrs.Bagavathi

Seeni Mytheen Vs Subaitha Ammal

Hazarath Khader, Aulia Wakf Vs Syed Ibrahim Rasheed

Arivalagan Vs Duraisamy

Kathayee Vs Subramanian

Badhurisha Vs a. Rajamohamed